LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

Religion as a factor of systemic social changes: the specifics of current situation

stmm. 2023 (4): 40-54

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.04.040

Full text: http://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2023-4/5.pdf

MAKSYM PARASHCHEVIN, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

paraschevin@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-4539

The one of results of secularization was diminishing of religion capacity to affect on social processes, in particular on social changes. At the same time there are enough examples from different countries when religion was significant for social changes, their direction and extent. Religious agents have participated in processes of democratization (but have supported conservative and authoritarian turns also), have promoted some changes of values and norms in the middle of broad masses. Such influence was making by religious organizations and communities mainly. They provided moral support of actions, directed to changing of social conditions, supported and promoted progressive and humanistic ideas, directly participated in social and political activity for the some programs, legitimized changes and de- legitimized existing order, was a means for mobilization of masses, acted as a part of civil society. But in modern societies, there are number of limitations for religious possibility to support the social changes or to direct implement them. Namely it is about the depth of personal religiosity of broad mass, the capacity of religion to give new ideas, related to secular norms of life (ideas which are inside of religious teaching, or promoted and supported by religious organizations), the presence of cooperation between religious organizations and secular institutions and communities). In secular societies, the possibilities of influence of religious actors are quite limited both for self-sufficiency (only combination of activity of secular and religious actors can be successful), and for extent (religious agents makes local effects of changes and changes in some social sphere or segments), and have extended in time efficiency. The turn of state to religious organizations for help in realization some plans of social transformations appears to be justified, but for realization of such politics great caution is required and such cooperation is must be a part of long strategy.

Keywords: social changes, religious doctrine, religious organizations, religious community, religion and economy, religion and politics, values

References

Yelenskyi, V. (2013). The Great Returning: Religion in Global Politics and International Affair the late XX - early XXI century. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: UKU.

Ermolaeva, E., Gruzdev A. (2021). Christian Church in Democratic Movement in Republic of Korea (1960-1970s). [In Russian]. Genesis: historical research, 3, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-868X.2021.3.35293

Lunkin, R. (2009). Protestantism and Globalization Across Eurasia. Religion and Globalization Across Eurasia (рр. 91-125). [In Russian]. Moskow: Russian Political Encyclopedia, Moscow Carnegie Center.

Uzlaner, D. (2019). The end of religion? A History of Secularization Theory. [In Russian]. Moskow: Izdatelskiy Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.

Shebalina, E. (2021). Vatican and Eurointegration: History and Present. [In Russian]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 39(3), 271-288.

Adamson, M., Borgos, S. (1984). This Mighty Dream: Social Protest Movements in the United States. Routledge Kegan & Paul.

Akanbi, S.O., Beyers, J. (2017). The church as a catalyst for transformation in the society. HTS Theological Studie, 73(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i4.4635

Borowik, I. (2002). The Roman Catholic Church in the Process of Democratic Transformation: the Case of Poland. Social Compass, 49(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768602049002008

Bruce, S. (1988). The Rise and Fall of the New Christian Right: Conservative Protestant Politics in America 1978-1988. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bruce, S. (2004). Did protestantism create democracy? Democratization, 11(4), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000234503

Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In Defense of an Unfashionable Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199654123.001.0001

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001

Casanova, J. (1997). Globalizing Catholicism and the Return to a 'Universal' Church. Transnational Religions and Fading States. Еd. by S.H. Rudolph and J.P. Piscatori (pp. 121-143). Boulder: Westview. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503467-6

Cavendish, J.C. (1994). Christian Base Communities and the Building of Democracy: Brazil and Chile. Sociology of Religion, 55(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711856

Harrison, L. (2012). Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Huntington, S. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.

Knoblauch, H. (2007). The sociology of religion and the 'desecularisation of society'. Revista Lusófona De Ciência Das Religiões, VI(11), 247-256.

Miller, D.E. (2011). Civil Society and Religion. In: The Oxford Handbook of civil society (p. 257-269). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.003.0021

McGuire, M. (1997). Religion - the social context. 4 Belmont: Wadsworth Publications Co.

Morris, A.D. (1984). The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Free Press.

Religion and European Integration. Religion as a Factor of Stability and Development in South Eastern Europe. (2007). Weimar: Verlag und Datenbank für Geisteswissenschaften.

Smith, B.H. (1975). Religion and social change: classical theories and new formulations in the context of recent developments in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 10(2), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100029812

Smith, C. (1994). The Spirit and Democracy: Base Communities, Protestantism, and Democratization in Latin America. Sociology of Religion, 55(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711853

Sombart, W. (1913). Der Bourgeois. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Sombart, W. (1911). Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben. Leipzig: Duncker.

Sztompka, P. (1993). The Sociology of Social Change. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wallis, R. (1982). Introduction: Religion and Change. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb012938

Received 26.08.2023

Religion as a factor of systemic social changes: the specifics of current situation

stmm. 2023 (4): 40-54

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.04.040

Full text: http://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2023-4/5.pdf

MAKSYM PARASHCHEVIN, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

paraschevin@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-4539

The one of results of secularization was diminishing of religion capacity to affect on social processes, in particular on social changes. At the same time there are enough examples from different countries when religion was significant for social changes, their direction and extent. Religious agents have participated in processes of democratization (but have supported conservative and authoritarian turns also), have promoted some changes of values and norms in the middle of broad masses. Such influence was making by religious organizations and communities mainly. They provided moral support of actions, directed to changing of social conditions, supported and promoted progressive and humanistic ideas, directly participated in social and political activity for the some programs, legitimized changes and de- legitimized existing order, was a means for mobilization of masses, acted as a part of civil society. But in modern societies, there are number of limitations for religious possibility to support the social changes or to direct implement them. Namely it is about the depth of personal religiosity of broad mass, the capacity of religion to give new ideas, related to secular norms of life (ideas which are inside of religious teaching, or promoted and supported by religious organizations), the presence of cooperation between religious organizations and secular institutions and communities). In secular societies, the possibilities of influence of religious actors are quite limited both for self-sufficiency (only combination of activity of secular and religious actors can be successful), and for extent (religious agents makes local effects of changes and changes in some social sphere or segments), and have extended in time efficiency. The turn of state to religious organizations for help in realization some plans of social transformations appears to be justified, but for realization of such politics great caution is required and such cooperation is must be a part of long strategy.

Keywords: social changes, religious doctrine, religious organizations, religious community, religion and economy, religion and politics, values

References

Yelenskyi, V. (2013). The Great Returning: Religion in Global Politics and International Affair the late XX - early XXI century. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: UKU.

Ermolaeva, E., Gruzdev A. (2021). Christian Church in Democratic Movement in Republic of Korea (1960-1970s). [In Russian]. Genesis: historical research, 3, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-868X.2021.3.35293

Lunkin, R. (2009). Protestantism and Globalization Across Eurasia. Religion and Globalization Across Eurasia (рр. 91-125). [In Russian]. Moskow: Russian Political Encyclopedia, Moscow Carnegie Center.

Uzlaner, D. (2019). The end of religion? A History of Secularization Theory. [In Russian]. Moskow: Izdatelskiy Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.

Shebalina, E. (2021). Vatican and Eurointegration: History and Present. [In Russian]. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 39(3), 271-288.

Adamson, M., Borgos, S. (1984). This Mighty Dream: Social Protest Movements in the United States. Routledge Kegan & Paul.

Akanbi, S.O., Beyers, J. (2017). The church as a catalyst for transformation in the society. HTS Theological Studie, 73(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i4.4635

Borowik, I. (2002). The Roman Catholic Church in the Process of Democratic Transformation: the Case of Poland. Social Compass, 49(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768602049002008

Bruce, S. (1988). The Rise and Fall of the New Christian Right: Conservative Protestant Politics in America 1978-1988. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bruce, S. (2004). Did protestantism create democracy? Democratization, 11(4), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000234503

Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In Defense of an Unfashionable Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199654123.001.0001

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001

Casanova, J. (1997). Globalizing Catholicism and the Return to a 'Universal' Church. Transnational Religions and Fading States. Еd. by S.H. Rudolph and J.P. Piscatori (pp. 121-143). Boulder: Westview. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503467-6

Cavendish, J.C. (1994). Christian Base Communities and the Building of Democracy: Brazil and Chile. Sociology of Religion, 55(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711856

Harrison, L. (2012). Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Huntington, S. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.

Knoblauch, H. (2007). The sociology of religion and the 'desecularisation of society'. Revista Lusófona De Ciência Das Religiões, VI(11), 247-256.

Miller, D.E. (2011). Civil Society and Religion. In: The Oxford Handbook of civil society (p. 257-269). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.003.0021

McGuire, M. (1997). Religion - the social context. 4 Belmont: Wadsworth Publications Co.

Morris, A.D. (1984). The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Free Press.

Religion and European Integration. Religion as a Factor of Stability and Development in South Eastern Europe. (2007). Weimar: Verlag und Datenbank für Geisteswissenschaften.

Smith, B.H. (1975). Religion and social change: classical theories and new formulations in the context of recent developments in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 10(2), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100029812

Smith, C. (1994). The Spirit and Democracy: Base Communities, Protestantism, and Democratization in Latin America. Sociology of Religion, 55(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711853

Sombart, W. (1913). Der Bourgeois. München und Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Sombart, W. (1911). Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben. Leipzig: Duncker.

Sztompka, P. (1993). The Sociology of Social Change. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wallis, R. (1982). Introduction: Religion and Change. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb012938

Received 26.08.2023

LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

} } } } }