Institute of Sociology NASU

THE PHENOMENON OF POPULISM IN DEVELOPED AND TRANSITIONAL SOCIETIES: FEATURES OF MANIFESTATIONS AND DETERMINANTS

stmm. 2022 (2): 59-73

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2022.02.059

OLEKSANDR RAKHMANOV, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

kneu_1906@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-5515

Recently, in many countries around the world there is a coming to power of political forces that differ from established political actors. The concept of «populism» is used when charismatic leaders and their parties offer the population to overcome existing socio-economic problems through simple, non-institutional solutions. Although these politicians and parties may differ in ideological rhetoric, they all have common features. The scientific literature indicates that several populist ideas are universal for most modern societies, which find a response among the electorate: people-centrism, anti-elitism and homogeneity of the people. In Western, established societies, there is support for right-wing populist parties. This is due to the dissatisfaction of the population with the changes caused by globalization. The processes of deindustrialization, informatization and the influx of migrants have intensified competition in the labor market. However, the decisive factor in supporting populism in Western European countries was the reaction of the once dominant sections of the population to changing values. The displacement of familiar norms of life infuriates people with traditional class identities. In contrast, in the post-communist societies of Central and Eastern Europe, in addition to the challenges of globalization, corruption and economic regulation have been added. Populist orientations in Eastern European societies are largely driven by factors related to socio-economic status and national identity. These conclusions are important for the study of populist orientations in Ukrainian society.

Keywords: populism, populist orientations, Western European societies, Eastern European societies

References

1. Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A., Spruyt, B. (2017). ‘We the People’ or ‘We the Peoples’? A Comparison of Support for the Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review, 23 (4), 377–403.
2. Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J. Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., Vachudova, M. (2015). The 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2015.1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina. Retrieved from: https://www.chesdata.eu/2014-chapel-hill-expert-survey
3. Boscán, G., Llamazares, I., Wiesehomeier, N. (2018). Populist Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Party Systems in Spain, France, and Italy. Revista Internacional de Sociologнa, 76 (4), e110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2018.76.4.18.001
4. Bustikova, L. (2017). The Radical Right in Eastern Europe. In: J. Rydgren (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190274559-e-28
5. Bustikova, L., Kitschelt, H. (2009). The Radical Right in Post-Communist Europe: Comparative Perspectives on Legacies and Party Competition. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42 (4), 459–483.
6. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47 (1), 2–16.
7. Dennison, J., Turnbull-Dugarte, S.J. (2022). Populist Attitudes and Threat Perceptions of Global Transformations and Governance: Experimental Evidence from India and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12817
8. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. (2009). Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (Spring), 285–321.
9. Dustmann, C., Eichengreen, B., Otten, S., Sapir, A., Tabellini, G., Zoega, G. (2017). Europe’s Trust Deficit: Causes and Remedies. Monitoring International Integration 1, CEPR Press. London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
10. Hawkins, K.A., Riding, S., Mudde, C. (2012). Measuring populist attitudes. Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, 55, 1–35.
11. Inglehart, R.F., Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic HaveNots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
12. Krastev, I. (2006): The New Europe: Respectable Populism, Clockwork Liberalism. Open Democracy, 21 March. Retrieved from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/new_europe_3376jsp
13. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., Frey, T. (2005). Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (6), 921–956.
14. Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37 (2), 361–78.
15. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 542–563.
16. Pastor, L., Veronesi, P. (2021). Inequality Aversion, Populism, and the Backlash against Globalization. The Journal of Finance, 76 (6), 2857–2906.
17. Rooduijn, M. (2014). The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator. Government and Opposition, 49 (4), 573–599.
18. Sierakowski, S. (2018). How Eastern European Populism is Different. The Strategist, 2 February. Retrieved from: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/easterneuropean-populism-different/
19. Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It? Political Research Quaterly, 69 (2), 335–346.
20. Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13 (1), 95–110.
21. Stanley, B. (2011). Populism, nationalism, or national populism? An analysis of Slovak voting behaviour at the 2010 parliamentary election. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44 (4), 257–270.
22. Stanley, B., Cześnik, M. (2021). Uninformed or informed populists? The relationship between political knowledge, socio-economic status and populist attitudes in Poland. East European Politics, 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2021.1876676
23. Szczerbiak, A. (2002). Poland’s unexpected political earthquake: the September 2001 parliamentary election. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 18 (3), 41–76.
24. van Kessel, S. (2014). The populist cat-dog: applying the concept of populism to contemporary European party systems. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19 (1), 99–118.
25. Vehrkamp, R., Merkel, W. (2020). Populismusbarometer 2020. Populistische Einstellungen bei Wählern und Nichtwählern in Deutschland 2020. Retrieved from: https://aswnord.de/fileadmin/user_upload/ZD_Studie_Populismusbarometer_2020.pdf

Received 30.05.2022