Institute of Sociology NASU

SOCIO-POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AS CHALLENGES TO THE LEGITIMACY OF SOCIAL ORDER IN UKRAINE

stmm. 2021 (3): 91-112

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2021.03.091

OLEKSANDR REZNIK, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Senior Research Fellow, Head of the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St. , Kyiv, 01021)

oleksanderreznik@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-8489

OLEKSANDR RAKHMANOV, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St. , Kyiv, 01021)

kneu_1906@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-5515

VOLODYMYR REZNIK, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Senior Research Fellow, Head of the Department of History and Theory of Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St. , Kyiv, 01021)

volodymyr.reznik@gmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-0034

The article analyzes the results of a sociological study of the socio-political consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukrainian society. The economic and social difficulties faced by people during the lockdowns have, as expected, caused dissatisfaction with the actions of state institutions. Public opinion on the government's efforts to combat the pandemic was based on its chaotic, inconsistent and often belated actions regarding the introduction of quarantine, mass vaccination and information policy. Our assumption was that the ineffective opposition of the Ukrainian authorities to the COVID-19 pandemic led to a negative perception of Ukrainians’ democratic legitimacy, their distrust of state institutions, growing social tensions, and increased support for paternalism and authoritarianism. To test this hypothesis, the dynamics of assessments of the government's actions in the confrontation with the pandemic, the determinants of trust in state institutions, attitudes on ways to ensure living standards and means of maintaining order in Ukraine, protest potential were analyzed. The empirical analysis was conducted on the basis of a sociological survey conducted by the sociological firm HUMAN RESEARCH from July 28 to August 7, 2021 as part of a research project of the Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine “Social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of social transformation in Ukraine: sociological approach” under a grant from the National Research Foundation of Ukraine. Methods of multiple linear regression and binary logistic regression were used to empirically assess the influence of explanatory variables on dependent variables. According to the analysis, the main challenge to the legitimacy of the social order in Ukraine was the decline in confidence in the central government, mainly due to negative assessments of its response to the coronavirus pandemic. However, there have been no significant shifts in the mass consciousness in support of paternalism and authoritarianism. The small share of support for these attitudes has little to do with assessments of the government's response to the pandemic. The increase in protest potential is also little associated with assessments of the government's response to the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, legitimacy, trust in state institutions, support for paternalism and authoritarianism, protest potential

References

1. Achen, C.H., Bartels, L.M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Aidt, T.S., Leon, G. (2016). The Democratic Window of Opportunity: Evidence from Riots in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60 (4), 694–717.
3. Amat, F., Arenas, A., Falcу-Gimeno, A., Muсoz, J. (2020). Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Spain. Preprint at SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/dkusw
4. Ashworth, S., Bueno de Mesquita, E., Friedenberg, A. (2018). Learning about Voter Rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 62 (1), 37–54.
5. Bækgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J.K., Mikkelsen, K.S. (2020). Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3 (2), 1–12.
6. Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A., Loewen, P.J. (2020). The effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy? European Journal of Political Research, 60 (2), 497–505.
7. Brückner, M., Ciccone, A. (2011). Rain and the Democratic Window of Opportunity. Econometrica, Econometric Society, 79 (3), 923–947.
8. Carlin, R.E., Love, G.J., Zechmeister, E.J. (2014). Natural Disaster and Democratic Legitimacy: The Public Consequences of Chile’s 2010 Earthquake and Tsunami. Political Research Quarterly, 67 (1), 3–15.
9. Clarke, E.J.E., Klas, A., Dyos, E. (2021). The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 1–6.
10. Duffy, B., Hewlett, K., Hesketh, R., Benson, R., Wager, A. (2021). Unequal Britain: Attitudes to Inequalities after COVID-19. London: The Policy Institute.
11. Farrell, J., Mueller, J.T., McConnell, K., Burow, P.B., Pofahl, K., Merdjanoff, A.A. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the rural West: Material needs, economic recovery, and changes in political attitudes. Executive Summary of Research Findings. New Haven, CT: Yale School of the Environment.
12. Ferrero, J., Natalucci, A. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemic and Social Unrest: The Social Protest by Other Means. Reflections on the Argentinian Case. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 39 (S1), 67–70.
13. Gerbaudo, P. (2020). The Pandemic Crowd: Protest in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of International Affairs, 73 (2), 61–76.
14. Goff, S., Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H., Reents, A., Wade, P. (2020). The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Government-and Market-Attitudes. Institute of Labor Economics, IZA DP No.13622.
15. Goldfinch, S., Taplin, R., Gauld, R. (2021). Trust in government increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80 (1), 3–11.
16. Healy, A., Malhotra, N. (2009). Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review, 103 (3), 387–406.
17. Herrera, H., Konradt, M., Ordoсez, G., Trebesch, C. (2020). The political consequences of the COVID pandemic: Lessons from cross-country polling data. VoxEU.org, 6 November. https://voxeu.org/article/political-consequences-covid-pandemic
18. Kowalewski, M. (2020). Street protests in times of COVID-19: adjusting tactics and marching ‘as usual’. Social Movement Studies, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1843014
19. Pinckney, J., Rivers, M. (2020). Sickness or Silence: Social Movement Adaptation to COVID-19. Journal of International Affairs, 73 (2), 23–42.
20. Rakhmanov, O. (2021). Paternalistic and authoritarian sentiments of Ukrainians during the pandemic: have there been any changes? [In Ukrainian]. In: The social experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine: a sociological dimension. Proceedings of the round table, November 20, 2020 (pp. 67–72). Kyiv: Interservice. [= Рахманов 2021]
21. Reznik, O. (2020). Factors that determine Ukrainian citizens’ attitudes towards governmental bodies during the pandemic. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian society: monitoring of social change, 7 (21), 35–41. [= Резнік 2020]
22. Reznik, O. (2021b). Protest potential and manifestations of social self-organization during a pandemic. [In Ukrainian]. In: The social experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine: a sociological dimension. Proceedings of the round table, November 20, 2020 (pp. 62–67). Kyiv: Interservice. [= Резнік 2020b]
23. Reznik, V. (2021a). Trust in government institutions and assessment of the effectiveness of public policy in countering the pandemic. [In Ukrainian]. In: The social experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine: a sociological dimension. Proceedings of the round table, November 20, 2020 (pp. 30–34). Kyiv: Interservice. [= Резнік 2020a]
24. Sibley, C.G., Greaves, L.M., Satherley, N., Wilson, M.S., Overall, N.C., Lee, C.H.J., Milojev, P., Bulbulia, J., Osborne, D., Milfont, T.L., Houkamau, C.A., Duck, I.M., Vickers-Jones, R., Barlow, F.K. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American Psychologist, 75 (5), 618–630.
25. Staerklė, C. (2015). Social order and political legitimacy. In: G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, J. Valsiner (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Piff, P.K., Shariff, A., Aknin, L.B. (2021). Recognizing the Impact of COVID-19 on the Poor Alters Attitudes Towards Poverty and Inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104083

Received 27.08.2021