Institute of Sociology NASU

Digitalization of economic life and social stratification in Ukraine: features of the relationship

stmm. 2025 (2): 80-96

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2025.02.080

Full text: https://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2025-2/6.pdf

OLEKSANDR RAKHMANOV, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow at the Department of Economic Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

kneu_1906@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-5515

SCOPUS ID – 57218850472

The article analyzes the mutual influence of digitalization on economic life and social stratification in Ukraine. The potential of social stratification theories in explaining digital inequalities is clarified. Based on data from a 2024 monitoring study by the Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine, the indicator of the use of digital tools in the workplace was analyzed in relation to the financial situation, employment status, self-assessment of status position, and objective class affiliation. The results of the analysis, obtained using the explanatory capabilities of classical theories of social stratification, indicate the existence of several trends. The Marxist approach came true in cases where digitalization in the workplace is more widespread among the employed population with the lowest level of material deprivation, among the self-employed, and among representatives of the class of small and medium-sized owners. The fact that skilled workers are more active in using digital devices and technologies than those in routine non-physical work is quite close to functionalist explanations of digital inequality when different demands on the labor market regulate and select the necessary people with the appropriate skills. Despite the dependence of digitalization on the level of financial situation and subjective social status, slightly less use of digital tools was recorded among the wealthiest respondents compared to the rich, and among those who placed themselves on the highest rungs compared to those who placed themselves in the middle. This phenomenon is explained by the Weberian interpretation, according to which according to which the prestige of being at the highest levels of the social hierarchy lies not so much in possessing the digital qualifications as, as in exercising the power.

Keywords: digitalization of economic life, social stratification, social status, Ukraine

References

1. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607

2. Boyko, N. (2016). Digital inequality in modern Ukrainian realities. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Society: Monitoring of Social Changes, 3(17), 137-149.

3. Brockmann, H., Drews, W., Torpey, J. (2021). A class for itself? On the worldviews of the new tech elite. PLoS ONE, 16(1), e0244071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244071

4. Compaigne, B. (Ed.). (2001). The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2419.001.0001

5. Darvin, R. (2018). Social class and the unequal digital literacies of youth. Language and Literacy, 20(3), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29407

6. Durkheim, E. (1997). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

7. Fuchs, C., Mosco, V. (2012). Introduction: Marx is back: the importance of Marxist theory and research for critical communication studies today. tripleC: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.421

8. Hargittai, E., Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782

9. Helsper, E., Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skills pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696-713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113499113

10. Martindale, N., Lehdonvirta, V. (2023). Labour market digitalization and social class: evidence of mobility and reproduction from a European survey of online platform workers. Socio-Economic Review, 21(4), 1945-1965. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad049

11. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1936). The Communist Manifesto [In Ukrainian]. In: K. Marx, F. Engels (Eds.), Selected works (vol. 1, pp. 151-189). Kyiv: Published by the Central Committee of the Communist Party (bolsheviks) of Ukraine.

12. Matzat, U., Van Ingen, E. (2020). Social inequality and the digital transformation of Western society: what can stratification research and digital divide studies learn from each other? Soziale Welt. Sonderband, 23, 379-397. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845295008-379

13. North, S.M., Snyder, I.A., Bulfin, S.A. (2008). Digital tastes: Social class and young people's technology use. Information, Communication and Society, 11(7), 895-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802109006

14. Ragnedda, M. (2017). The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian approach to rethinking digital inequalities. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606002

15. Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.W. (2017). Theorizing digital divides and inequalities. In: J. Servaes, T. Oyedemi (Eds.), Social Inequalities, Media, and Communication: Theory and Roots (pp. 23-35). New York: Macmillan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978731585.ch-002

16. Romanenko, S.V. (2018). Digital inequality as a form of social differentiation. [In Ukrainian]. In: V. Bakirov, O. Kutsenko, L. Sokuryanska (Eds.), Social inequalities: perception by Ukrainian society (final report) (pp. 108-116). Kharkiv: Sociological Association of Ukraine. https://sau.in.ua/app/uploads/2019/07/ZVIT_SOCZIALNI-NERIVNOSTI_2018_.pdf

17. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519

18. Sokolovskyy, I. (2023). Ukraine's labor market after a year and a half of full-scale war: non-standard employment and digitalization. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 89-106. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.04.089

19. Symonchuk, O. (2018). Social Classes in Modern Societies: Heuristic Potential of Class Analysis. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine.

20. The Future of Jobs Report. (2025). Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/

21. Van Deursen, A., Helsper, E.J., Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834

22. Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774

23. Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

24. Weber, M. (2012). Economy and Society: Essays on the Sociology of Understanding. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Vsesvit.

25. Wilson, K.R., Wallin, J.S., Reiser, C. (2003). Social stratification and the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303021002001

26. Zillien, N., Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: status-specific Internet uses. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x

Received 11.02.2025