LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

The social organization of war: Ukrainian and Russian societies mobilized for war

stmm. 2025 (2): 30-58

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2025.02.030

Full text: https://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2025-2/4.pdf

NICOLAS HAYOZ, Doctor, Professor at the Department of European Studies and Slavic Studies, Faculty for Humanities, University of Fribourg (90, bd. de Pérolles, Fribourg (Switzerland), 1700)

nicolas.hayoz@unifr.ch

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-1011

VIKTOR STEPANENKO, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Chief Research Fellow at the Department of History and Theory of Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv (Ukraine), 01021)

vikstepa@i-soc.org.ua

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-0057

This paper aims to analyze how Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has changed Ukrainian and Russian societies. It looks at the social organization of war, at how Ukraine and Russia adapt and change under wartime conditions. Combining political science and sociological approaches, we interpret the war under organizational and communicative aspects in the context of opposite political regimes: dictatorial autocracy in Russia versus democracy in Ukraine. Opposite regimes imply opposite meanings and objectives of war, of warfare and the military. Big differences exist regarding organizing and mobilizing resources and support for the war — with considerable advantages for a dictatorship such as Russia controlling its societal space by the means of repression and propaganda. Societies at war need to be distinguished from an organized and highly militarized war society such as Russia which has imposed on its neighbor military, organizational and ideological constraints to which Ukraine must respond with its own militarization and organization of war and warfare. The social organization of war is understood as a complex multi-layered interplay of various institutional actors and spheres (the state, the military, NGOs, business, media, public and private spheres, etc.). Military mobilization in both societies also has different organizational and communicative effects as well as various, often contrasting, political, cultural and societal implications.

Keywords: war society, organizations, public mobilization, ‘frontier society’, state-society relations, ideological indoctrination, values, societal transformation

References:

  1. Ackerman, G. (2023). Mentale Militarisierung und Vorbereitung auf den Krieg. In: Stéphane Courtois, Galia Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 167-179). München: Piper.

  2. Ahlers, A.L., Stichweh, R. (2020). Die Bipolarität von Demokratie und Autoritarismus und ihre gesellschaftlichen Ursprünge. Soziale Systeme, 25(2), 377-417. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2020-0021

  3. Applebaum, A., Goldberg, J. (2023). The Counteroffensive. The Atlantic, June 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/06/counteroffensive-ukrainezelensky-crimea/673781/

  4. Arato, A., Cohen, J. (1988). Civil Society and Social Theory. Thesis Eleven, 21(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368802100104

  5. Ash, T.G. (2023). Postimperial Empire. How the War in Ukraine Is Transforming Europe. Foreign Affairs, 102(3), 65-75.

  6. Benton, L. (2022). Evil Empires? The Long Shadow of British Colonialism. Foreign Affairs, 101(4), 190-196.

  7. Bonenberger, A. (2022). Ukraine's Military Pulled Itself Out of the Ruins of 2014. Foreign Policy, May 9. Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/05/09/ukraine-military-2014-russia-us-training/

  8. Bouchet, N. (2016). Russia's "Militarization" of Colour Revolutions. Policy Perspectives, 4(2). Retrieved from: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/PP4-2.pdf

  9. Broad, W. (2022). Ukraine Gave Up a Giant Nuclear Arsenal 30 Years Ago. Today There Are Regrets. New York Times, February 5. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/05/science/ukraine-nuclear-weapons.html

  10. Bryant, C. (1995). Civic Nation, Civil Society, Civil Religion. In: J.A. Hall (Ed.), Civil Society. Theory, History, Comparison (pp. 136-157). Cambridge: Polity Press.

  11. Burlyuk, O., Shapovalova, N., Zarembo, K. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue. Civil Society in Ukraine: Building on the Euromaidan Legacy. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 3(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj119977.2017-3.1-22

  12. Courtois, S. (2023). Putin und seine orwellsche Umschreibung der Geschichte. In: S. Courtois, G. Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 359-388). München: Piper.

  13. Drepper, T. (2018). Organisationen der Gesellschaft. Gesellschaft und Organisation in der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21718-1

  14. Edwards, M. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.001.0001

  15. Estis, A. (2022). Putins pervertierte Universitäten. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 8, 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/putins-pervertierte-universitaetenumbau-an-russlands-hochschulen-18266175.html

  16. Etkind, A. (2023). Russia against Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  17. Fedor, J. (2017). Russlands Unsterbliches Regiment. Der Staat, die Gesellschaft und die Mobilisierung der Toten. Osteuropa, 67(5), 61-85.

  18. Fischer, S. (2022). Russia on the Road to Dictatorship. Internal Political Repercussions of the Attack on Ukraine. SWP Comment, April. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2022C30/.

  19. Freedman, L. (2023). Putin is Running out of Options in Ukraine. Russia Edges Closer to a Reckoning. Foreign Affairs, 102, July 25. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/putin-running-out-options-ukraine

  20. Freedom House. (2023). Nations in Transit 2023. Washington (D.C.): Freedom House. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/NIT_2023_Digital.pdf

  21. Friedman, T.L. (2022). Putin is Trying to Outcrazy the West. New York Times, September 30. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/30/opinion/putin-russia-ukraine.html

  22. Galeotti, M. (2022a). Putin's Wars from Chechnya to Ukraine. Oxford: Osprey. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472847522

  23. Galeotti, M. (2022b). Putin is slowly turning Russia into North Korea. The Sunday Times, November 5. Retrieved from: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/putin-proceeds-with-north-koreanisation-of-russiadf9ddv87k.

  24. Garner, I. (2023). Generation Z. Into the Heart of Russia's Fascist Youth. London: Hurst & Company.

  25. Gellner, E. (1996). Condition of Liberty. Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Penguin Books.

  26. Giles, K. (2023). Russia's War on Everybody and What it Means for You. London: Bloomsbury Academics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350255111

  27. Golovakha, Ye. (2022). High level of national resilience. Interview. [In Ukrainian]. NV, June 7. Retrieved from: https://life.nv.ua/ukr/socium/chim-vidriznyayutsya-rosiyani-taukrajinci-sociolog-pro-te-shcho-viyavila-viyna-novini-ukrajini-50248594.html

  28. Gready, P., Robins, S. (2017). Rethinking Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Lessons from Social Movements and 'New' Civil Society. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21, 956-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1313237

  29. Gudkov, L. (2017). Wahres Denken. Analysen, Diagnosen, Interventionen. Berlin: Edition Osteuropa.

  30. Hale, H. (2015). Patronal Politics. Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683524

  31. Hayoz, N. (2007). Regionale 'organisierte Gesellschaften' und ihre Schwierigkeiten mit der Realität der funktionalen Differenzierung. Soziale Systeme, 13(1), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2007-1-215

  32. Hayoz, N. (2016). Organizing War and the Military in Society: A Systemic Perspective. Russian Sociological Review, 15(2), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2016-2-9-25

  33. Hayoz, N. (2018). "Modern Authoritarians" Coping with the Challenge of Modern Society. Soziale Systeme, 23(1-2), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2018-0005

  34. Hoban, I. (2022): Militarization of Childhood(s) in Donbas: 'Growing together with the Republic'. Cooperation and Conflict, 57(1), 108-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211036917

  35. Hrushetskyi, A. (2022). A sense of personal belonging to the national resistance to the enemy. KIIS press release, November 9. [=In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1158&page=1

  36. Hrushetskyi, A. (2023). Dynamics of Ukrainians' attitude to Stalin during 2012-2023. KIIS press release, August 3. [=In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1273&page=1

  37. Hunter, M. (2018). Crowdsourced War: The Political and Military Implications of Ukraine's Volunteer Battalions 2014-2015. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 18(3), 79-124.

  38. Kean, J. (2010). Civil Society, Definitions and Approaches. In: Helmut Anheier/Stefan Toepler/ Regina (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 451-454). New York: Springer.

  39. Kendall-Taylor, A., Lindstaedt, N., Frantz, E. (2019). Democracies and Authoritarian Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198820819.001.0001

  40. Kerrane, E. (2022). Russian Militarism in an Era of Great Power Competition. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 13 (Special Issue on Strategic Culture), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.2022SIstratcul005

  41. Klein, M., Schreiber, N.H. (2022). The Attack on Ukraine and the Militarisation of Russian Foreign and Domestic policy. SWP Comment, December. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/the-attack-on-ukraine-andthe-militarisation-of-russian-foreign-and-domestic-policy

  42. Kolesnikov, A. (2015). Russian Ideology after Crimea. Moscow: Carnegie Center. Retrieved from: http://carnegie.ru/2015/09/22/russian-ideology-after-crimea-pub-61350

  43. Krechko, Ya., Lohinov, Ye., Terebinska, O. (2023). Fierce battles: what does the Armed Forces of Ukraine lack to defeat Russia? Donbas.Realities, February 26. Retrieved from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/choho-ne-vystachae-ukraini-dlyaperemogy-nad-rosieyu/32288638.html

  44. Kruse, V. (2009). Mobilisierung und kriegsgesellschaftliches Dilemma. Beobachtungen zur kriegsgesellschaftlichen Moderne. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(3), 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2009-0302

  45. Kruse, V. (2015). Kriegsgesellschaftliche Moderne. Konstanz: UVK.

  46. Kudors, A. (Ed.). (2016). Fortress Russia: Political, Economic, and Security Development in Russia Following the Annexation of Crimea and its Consequences for the Baltic States. Riga: The Centre for East European Policy Studies.

  47. Kuzio, T. (2023). Fascism and Genocide. Russia's war against Ukrainians. Stuttgart: Ibidem.

  48. Lebedev, A. C. (2023). Deux sociétés dans la guerre. Entretien avec Anna Colin Lebedev. Esprit Mars, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.3917/espri.2303.0049

  49. Leggewie, C. (2023). Faschismus und kein Ende? In: S. Courtois, G. Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 117-127). München: Piper.

  50. Luhmann, N. (1975). Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft. In: N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (SS. 9-20) Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12374-3_1

  51. Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of Society. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  52. Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of Society. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  53. Luhmann, N. (2018). Organization and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560672

  54. MacMillan, M. (2020). War. How Conflict Shaped Us. London: Profile Books.

  55. Magyar, B., Madlovics, B. (2020). The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes. A Conceptual Framework. Budapest; New York: CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.7829/9789633863701

  56. Malesevic, S. (2023). The Moral Fog of War and Historical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 26, 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231165218

  57. Mischenko, M. (2023). This War helped Ukrainians realize themselves as a Nation. Razumkov Centre, March 22. Retrieved from: https://razumkov.org.ua/en/articles/this-war-helped-ukrainians-realisethemselves-as-a-nation

  58. Paniotto, V. (2023). The attitude of Ukrainians to the holidays of May 1 (Labor Day) and May 9 (Victory Day). KIIS press release, April 30. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1229&page=1

  59. Plokhy, S. (2023). The Russo-Ukrainian War. Dublin: Allen Lane/Pinguin Books.

  60. Polegkyi, O. (2022). "Never Again" vs. "We Can Repeat It": Russians will Pay Any Price to Restore the Glory of Soviet Victory in WWII. Forum for Ukrainian Studies, June 11. Retrieved from: https://ukrainian-studies.ca/2022/06/11/never-again-vs-we-can-repeat-it-russians-will-pay-any-price-torestore-the-glory-of-soviet-victory-in-wwii%EF%BF%BC/

  61. Pollack, D. (1990). Das Ende einer Organisationsgesellschaft. Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zum gesellschaftlichen Umbruch in der DDR. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0405

  62. Puglisi, R. (2015). Heroes or Villains? Volunteer Battalions in Post-Maidan Ukraine. IAI Working Paper. Rome: Instituto Affari Internazionale. Retrieved from: https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/heroes-orvillains

  63. Pynnöniemi, K. (Ed.). (2021). Nexus of Patriotism and Militarism in Russia. A Quest for Internal Cohesion. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-9

  64. Rose, G. (2013). Ukraine's Winnable war. Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory. Foreign Affairs, June 13. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/ukraines-winnable-war

  65. Rose, R. (2008). Understanding Post-Communist Transformation. A Bottom-up Approach. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884935

  66. Skigin, P. (2020). Neopatrimonialism: The Russian Regime through a Weberian Lens. In: A. Etkind, M. Minakov (Eds.), Ideology after Union. Political Doctrines, Discourses, and Debates in Post-Soviet Societies (pp. 93-110). Stuttgart: Ibidem.

  67. Snegovaya, M. (2023). Why Russia's Democracy Never Began. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.a900436

  68. Stepanenko, V. (2015). Ukraine's Revolution as De-Institutionalization of the Post-Soviet Order. In: V. Stepanenko, Ya. Pylynskyi (Eds.), Ukraine after the Euromaidan: Challenges and Hopes (pp. 29-46). Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0798-2

  69. Stepanenko, V. (2022). Ukrainian society under war: An insider's sociological notes. Przeglad Socjologiczny, 77(3), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.3/1

  70. Stewart, S., Dollbaum, J.M. (2017). Civil Society Development in Russia and Ukraine: Diverging paths. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.08.001

  71. Stykow, P., Baumann, J. (2023). Das politische System Russlands. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748923558

  72. Sztompka, P. (2023). The Bright Side of a Tragedy: on the Unintended and Unanticipated Consequences of the Barbaric Aggression. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 1, 6-9.

  73. Umland, A. (2022). A Neutral and Demilitarized Ukraine? Moscow's Demands of Kyiv in Geostrategic Perspective. SCEEUS Commentary, 9/2022. Retrieved from: https://sceeus.se/en/publications/aneutral-and-demilitarized-ukraine-moscows-demands-of-kyiv-in-geostrategic-perspective

  74. Vorozejikina, T. (2018). Parasitärer Autoritarismus. Regime und Gesellschaft in Russland. Osteuropa, 68(8-9), 3-24.

  75. Way, L.A. (2023). Don't Count the Dictators Out. The Underappreciated Resilience of Today's Autocracies. Foreign Affairs, 102(4), 104-115.

  76. Zagorodnyuk, A., Frolova, A., Midtunn, H.P., Pavliuchyk, O. (2021). Is Ukraine's Reformed Military Ready to Repel a New Russian Invasion? Atlantic Council, December 23. Retrieved from: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/is-ukraines-reformed-military-ready-torepel-a-new-russian-invasion

  77. Zarembo, K., Martin, E. (2023). Civil Society and Sense of Community in Ukraine: From Democracy to Action. European Societies, March, 1-27.

Received 04.04.2025 Accepted for publication after review 15.04.2025 Published 2025

The social organization of war: Ukrainian and Russian societies mobilized for war

stmm. 2025 (2): 30-58

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2025.02.030

Full text: https://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2025-2/4.pdf

NICOLAS HAYOZ, Doctor, Professor at the Department of European Studies and Slavic Studies, Faculty for Humanities, University of Fribourg (90, bd. de Pérolles, Fribourg (Switzerland), 1700)

nicolas.hayoz@unifr.ch

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-1011

VIKTOR STEPANENKO, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Chief Research Fellow at the Department of History and Theory of Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv (Ukraine), 01021)

vikstepa@i-soc.org.ua

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-0057

This paper aims to analyze how Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has changed Ukrainian and Russian societies. It looks at the social organization of war, at how Ukraine and Russia adapt and change under wartime conditions. Combining political science and sociological approaches, we interpret the war under organizational and communicative aspects in the context of opposite political regimes: dictatorial autocracy in Russia versus democracy in Ukraine. Opposite regimes imply opposite meanings and objectives of war, of warfare and the military. Big differences exist regarding organizing and mobilizing resources and support for the war — with considerable advantages for a dictatorship such as Russia controlling its societal space by the means of repression and propaganda. Societies at war need to be distinguished from an organized and highly militarized war society such as Russia which has imposed on its neighbor military, organizational and ideological constraints to which Ukraine must respond with its own militarization and organization of war and warfare. The social organization of war is understood as a complex multi-layered interplay of various institutional actors and spheres (the state, the military, NGOs, business, media, public and private spheres, etc.). Military mobilization in both societies also has different organizational and communicative effects as well as various, often contrasting, political, cultural and societal implications.

Keywords: war society, organizations, public mobilization, ‘frontier society’, state-society relations, ideological indoctrination, values, societal transformation

References:

  1. Ackerman, G. (2023). Mentale Militarisierung und Vorbereitung auf den Krieg. In: Stéphane Courtois, Galia Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 167-179). München: Piper.

  2. Ahlers, A.L., Stichweh, R. (2020). Die Bipolarität von Demokratie und Autoritarismus und ihre gesellschaftlichen Ursprünge. Soziale Systeme, 25(2), 377-417. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2020-0021

  3. Applebaum, A., Goldberg, J. (2023). The Counteroffensive. The Atlantic, June 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/06/counteroffensive-ukrainezelensky-crimea/673781/

  4. Arato, A., Cohen, J. (1988). Civil Society and Social Theory. Thesis Eleven, 21(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368802100104

  5. Ash, T.G. (2023). Postimperial Empire. How the War in Ukraine Is Transforming Europe. Foreign Affairs, 102(3), 65-75.

  6. Benton, L. (2022). Evil Empires? The Long Shadow of British Colonialism. Foreign Affairs, 101(4), 190-196.

  7. Bonenberger, A. (2022). Ukraine's Military Pulled Itself Out of the Ruins of 2014. Foreign Policy, May 9. Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/05/09/ukraine-military-2014-russia-us-training/

  8. Bouchet, N. (2016). Russia's "Militarization" of Colour Revolutions. Policy Perspectives, 4(2). Retrieved from: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/PP4-2.pdf

  9. Broad, W. (2022). Ukraine Gave Up a Giant Nuclear Arsenal 30 Years Ago. Today There Are Regrets. New York Times, February 5. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/05/science/ukraine-nuclear-weapons.html

  10. Bryant, C. (1995). Civic Nation, Civil Society, Civil Religion. In: J.A. Hall (Ed.), Civil Society. Theory, History, Comparison (pp. 136-157). Cambridge: Polity Press.

  11. Burlyuk, O., Shapovalova, N., Zarembo, K. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue. Civil Society in Ukraine: Building on the Euromaidan Legacy. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 3(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj119977.2017-3.1-22

  12. Courtois, S. (2023). Putin und seine orwellsche Umschreibung der Geschichte. In: S. Courtois, G. Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 359-388). München: Piper.

  13. Drepper, T. (2018). Organisationen der Gesellschaft. Gesellschaft und Organisation in der Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21718-1

  14. Edwards, M. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.001.0001

  15. Estis, A. (2022). Putins pervertierte Universitäten. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 8, 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/putins-pervertierte-universitaetenumbau-an-russlands-hochschulen-18266175.html

  16. Etkind, A. (2023). Russia against Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  17. Fedor, J. (2017). Russlands Unsterbliches Regiment. Der Staat, die Gesellschaft und die Mobilisierung der Toten. Osteuropa, 67(5), 61-85.

  18. Fischer, S. (2022). Russia on the Road to Dictatorship. Internal Political Repercussions of the Attack on Ukraine. SWP Comment, April. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2022C30/.

  19. Freedman, L. (2023). Putin is Running out of Options in Ukraine. Russia Edges Closer to a Reckoning. Foreign Affairs, 102, July 25. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/putin-running-out-options-ukraine

  20. Freedom House. (2023). Nations in Transit 2023. Washington (D.C.): Freedom House. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/NIT_2023_Digital.pdf

  21. Friedman, T.L. (2022). Putin is Trying to Outcrazy the West. New York Times, September 30. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/30/opinion/putin-russia-ukraine.html

  22. Galeotti, M. (2022a). Putin's Wars from Chechnya to Ukraine. Oxford: Osprey. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472847522

  23. Galeotti, M. (2022b). Putin is slowly turning Russia into North Korea. The Sunday Times, November 5. Retrieved from: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/putin-proceeds-with-north-koreanisation-of-russiadf9ddv87k.

  24. Garner, I. (2023). Generation Z. Into the Heart of Russia's Fascist Youth. London: Hurst & Company.

  25. Gellner, E. (1996). Condition of Liberty. Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Penguin Books.

  26. Giles, K. (2023). Russia's War on Everybody and What it Means for You. London: Bloomsbury Academics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350255111

  27. Golovakha, Ye. (2022). High level of national resilience. Interview. [In Ukrainian]. NV, June 7. Retrieved from: https://life.nv.ua/ukr/socium/chim-vidriznyayutsya-rosiyani-taukrajinci-sociolog-pro-te-shcho-viyavila-viyna-novini-ukrajini-50248594.html

  28. Gready, P., Robins, S. (2017). Rethinking Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Lessons from Social Movements and 'New' Civil Society. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21, 956-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1313237

  29. Gudkov, L. (2017). Wahres Denken. Analysen, Diagnosen, Interventionen. Berlin: Edition Osteuropa.

  30. Hale, H. (2015). Patronal Politics. Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683524

  31. Hayoz, N. (2007). Regionale 'organisierte Gesellschaften' und ihre Schwierigkeiten mit der Realität der funktionalen Differenzierung. Soziale Systeme, 13(1), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2007-1-215

  32. Hayoz, N. (2016). Organizing War and the Military in Society: A Systemic Perspective. Russian Sociological Review, 15(2), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2016-2-9-25

  33. Hayoz, N. (2018). "Modern Authoritarians" Coping with the Challenge of Modern Society. Soziale Systeme, 23(1-2), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2018-0005

  34. Hoban, I. (2022): Militarization of Childhood(s) in Donbas: 'Growing together with the Republic'. Cooperation and Conflict, 57(1), 108-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211036917

  35. Hrushetskyi, A. (2022). A sense of personal belonging to the national resistance to the enemy. KIIS press release, November 9. [=In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1158&page=1

  36. Hrushetskyi, A. (2023). Dynamics of Ukrainians' attitude to Stalin during 2012-2023. KIIS press release, August 3. [=In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1273&page=1

  37. Hunter, M. (2018). Crowdsourced War: The Political and Military Implications of Ukraine's Volunteer Battalions 2014-2015. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 18(3), 79-124.

  38. Kean, J. (2010). Civil Society, Definitions and Approaches. In: Helmut Anheier/Stefan Toepler/ Regina (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 451-454). New York: Springer.

  39. Kendall-Taylor, A., Lindstaedt, N., Frantz, E. (2019). Democracies and Authoritarian Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198820819.001.0001

  40. Kerrane, E. (2022). Russian Militarism in an Era of Great Power Competition. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 13 (Special Issue on Strategic Culture), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.2022SIstratcul005

  41. Klein, M., Schreiber, N.H. (2022). The Attack on Ukraine and the Militarisation of Russian Foreign and Domestic policy. SWP Comment, December. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/the-attack-on-ukraine-andthe-militarisation-of-russian-foreign-and-domestic-policy

  42. Kolesnikov, A. (2015). Russian Ideology after Crimea. Moscow: Carnegie Center. Retrieved from: http://carnegie.ru/2015/09/22/russian-ideology-after-crimea-pub-61350

  43. Krechko, Ya., Lohinov, Ye., Terebinska, O. (2023). Fierce battles: what does the Armed Forces of Ukraine lack to defeat Russia? Donbas.Realities, February 26. Retrieved from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/choho-ne-vystachae-ukraini-dlyaperemogy-nad-rosieyu/32288638.html

  44. Kruse, V. (2009). Mobilisierung und kriegsgesellschaftliches Dilemma. Beobachtungen zur kriegsgesellschaftlichen Moderne. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(3), 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2009-0302

  45. Kruse, V. (2015). Kriegsgesellschaftliche Moderne. Konstanz: UVK.

  46. Kudors, A. (Ed.). (2016). Fortress Russia: Political, Economic, and Security Development in Russia Following the Annexation of Crimea and its Consequences for the Baltic States. Riga: The Centre for East European Policy Studies.

  47. Kuzio, T. (2023). Fascism and Genocide. Russia's war against Ukrainians. Stuttgart: Ibidem.

  48. Lebedev, A. C. (2023). Deux sociétés dans la guerre. Entretien avec Anna Colin Lebedev. Esprit Mars, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.3917/espri.2303.0049

  49. Leggewie, C. (2023). Faschismus und kein Ende? In: S. Courtois, G. Ackerman (Eds.), Schwarzbuch Putin (SS. 117-127). München: Piper.

  50. Luhmann, N. (1975). Interaktion, Organisation, Gesellschaft. In: N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (SS. 9-20) Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12374-3_1

  51. Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of Society. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  52. Luhmann, N. (2013). Theory of Society. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  53. Luhmann, N. (2018). Organization and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560672

  54. MacMillan, M. (2020). War. How Conflict Shaped Us. London: Profile Books.

  55. Magyar, B., Madlovics, B. (2020). The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes. A Conceptual Framework. Budapest; New York: CEU Press. https://doi.org/10.7829/9789633863701

  56. Malesevic, S. (2023). The Moral Fog of War and Historical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 26, 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231165218

  57. Mischenko, M. (2023). This War helped Ukrainians realize themselves as a Nation. Razumkov Centre, March 22. Retrieved from: https://razumkov.org.ua/en/articles/this-war-helped-ukrainians-realisethemselves-as-a-nation

  58. Paniotto, V. (2023). The attitude of Ukrainians to the holidays of May 1 (Labor Day) and May 9 (Victory Day). KIIS press release, April 30. Retrieved from: https://kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1229&page=1

  59. Plokhy, S. (2023). The Russo-Ukrainian War. Dublin: Allen Lane/Pinguin Books.

  60. Polegkyi, O. (2022). "Never Again" vs. "We Can Repeat It": Russians will Pay Any Price to Restore the Glory of Soviet Victory in WWII. Forum for Ukrainian Studies, June 11. Retrieved from: https://ukrainian-studies.ca/2022/06/11/never-again-vs-we-can-repeat-it-russians-will-pay-any-price-torestore-the-glory-of-soviet-victory-in-wwii%EF%BF%BC/

  61. Pollack, D. (1990). Das Ende einer Organisationsgesellschaft. Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zum gesellschaftlichen Umbruch in der DDR. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0405

  62. Puglisi, R. (2015). Heroes or Villains? Volunteer Battalions in Post-Maidan Ukraine. IAI Working Paper. Rome: Instituto Affari Internazionale. Retrieved from: https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/heroes-orvillains

  63. Pynnöniemi, K. (Ed.). (2021). Nexus of Patriotism and Militarism in Russia. A Quest for Internal Cohesion. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-9

  64. Rose, G. (2013). Ukraine's Winnable war. Why the West Should Help Kyiv Retake All Its Territory. Foreign Affairs, June 13. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/ukraines-winnable-war

  65. Rose, R. (2008). Understanding Post-Communist Transformation. A Bottom-up Approach. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884935

  66. Skigin, P. (2020). Neopatrimonialism: The Russian Regime through a Weberian Lens. In: A. Etkind, M. Minakov (Eds.), Ideology after Union. Political Doctrines, Discourses, and Debates in Post-Soviet Societies (pp. 93-110). Stuttgart: Ibidem.

  67. Snegovaya, M. (2023). Why Russia's Democracy Never Began. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.a900436

  68. Stepanenko, V. (2015). Ukraine's Revolution as De-Institutionalization of the Post-Soviet Order. In: V. Stepanenko, Ya. Pylynskyi (Eds.), Ukraine after the Euromaidan: Challenges and Hopes (pp. 29-46). Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0798-2

  69. Stepanenko, V. (2022). Ukrainian society under war: An insider's sociological notes. Przeglad Socjologiczny, 77(3), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2022/71.3/1

  70. Stewart, S., Dollbaum, J.M. (2017). Civil Society Development in Russia and Ukraine: Diverging paths. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.08.001

  71. Stykow, P., Baumann, J. (2023). Das politische System Russlands. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748923558

  72. Sztompka, P. (2023). The Bright Side of a Tragedy: on the Unintended and Unanticipated Consequences of the Barbaric Aggression. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 1, 6-9.

  73. Umland, A. (2022). A Neutral and Demilitarized Ukraine? Moscow's Demands of Kyiv in Geostrategic Perspective. SCEEUS Commentary, 9/2022. Retrieved from: https://sceeus.se/en/publications/aneutral-and-demilitarized-ukraine-moscows-demands-of-kyiv-in-geostrategic-perspective

  74. Vorozejikina, T. (2018). Parasitärer Autoritarismus. Regime und Gesellschaft in Russland. Osteuropa, 68(8-9), 3-24.

  75. Way, L.A. (2023). Don't Count the Dictators Out. The Underappreciated Resilience of Today's Autocracies. Foreign Affairs, 102(4), 104-115.

  76. Zagorodnyuk, A., Frolova, A., Midtunn, H.P., Pavliuchyk, O. (2021). Is Ukraine's Reformed Military Ready to Repel a New Russian Invasion? Atlantic Council, December 23. Retrieved from: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/is-ukraines-reformed-military-ready-torepel-a-new-russian-invasion

  77. Zarembo, K., Martin, E. (2023). Civil Society and Sense of Community in Ukraine: From Democracy to Action. European Societies, March, 1-27.

Received 04.04.2025 Accepted for publication after review 15.04.2025 Published 2025

LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

} } } } }