Discursive construction of social identity: a conceptual model for the linguistic analysis of language markers

TETYANA KHRABAN, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of English Philology and Translation, State University “Kyiv Aviation Institute” (1, Liubomyr Huzar Ave., Kyiv, 03058)

xraban.tatyana@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-5170

SCOPUS ID: 57215581503

The context-dependent nature of the social meaning of linguistic resources complicates the development of criteria for determining when such resources can be treated as markers of social identity. The article aims to develop a conceptual model for the linguistic analysis of social identity markers by specifying functional categories and criteria for their analytical identification in discourse. The study is theoretical and methodological in nature and draws on an analytical-thematic review of scholarship in the sociology of identity, sociolinguistics, and sociocultural linguistics, combined with conceptual analysis and modelling. The model distinguishes between a linguistic resource and its analytical status as a marker of social identity, with marker status established on the basis of the resource’s function in a specific discourse context and the relevance of that function to processes of social identification. Five operational categories are distinguished on functional grounds: nomination, attribution, identification, positioning, and relationality. They refer, respectively, to the categorical designation of social actors, the attribution of socially significant characteristics, the establishment of membership or non-membership in a social category or community, the construction of an actor’s position in interaction, and the construction of socially significant relations between actors or groups. The categories are parallel rather than sequential and are not assigned a priori to specific linguistic forms. The methodological contribution of the model lies in establishing an operational link between theoretical accounts of social identification and the context-dependent nature of social meaning, on the one hand, and the functional categorisation of linguistic data, on the other, without directly converting theoretical principles into coding categories. The model captures discursively accessible manifestations of social identification but does not warrant conclusions about social identity beyond the discourse under analysis. Further empirical validation is required to assess the discriminability of the functional categories and the robustness of the criteria used to identify them.

Keywords: social identity, social identification, linguistic resource, linguistic marker of social identity, discourse, functional categorisation, linguistic analysis

References:

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Editions and NLB.

Ahearn, L.M. (2011). Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340563

Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday & Company.

Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.

Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity (4th edn.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887104

Khraban, T. (2024). Developing a Well-balanced Military Identity among Female Military Personnel. Polish Sociological Review, 1(225), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr225.04

Kiesling, S.F. (2022). Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics, 8, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256

Kulyk, V. (2023). National Identity in Time of War: Ukraine after the Russian Aggressions of 2014 and 2022. Problems of Post-Communism, 71, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2023.2224571

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Lamont, M. & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

McEntee-Atalianis, L. (2022). Language and identity: Past concerns, future directions. Sociolinguistica, 36(1–2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2022-0003

Nedashkivska, A. (2024). Language activism and the power of language in Ukraine during the war (2022–23). Canadian Slavonic Papers, 66(3–4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2024.2413757

Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In: A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge University Press.

Sierra, S. (2023). The epistemics of authentication and denaturalization in the construction of identities in social interaction. Language in Society, 52(4), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000161

Smith, A.D. (1991). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Visakko, T. & Lehtonen, H. (2024). Indexicality. In: M. Vandenbroucke, J. Declercq, F. Brisard, & S. D’hondt (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: 27th annual installment (pp. 129–154). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.27.ind4

Zentz, L. (2021). LadiesWeGotYou: Stances of moral-political alignment in the formation of group identity on Facebook. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25, 852–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12507

Received 19.07.2026

Accepted for publication after review 10.09.2026