Institute of Sociology NASU

Experiencing the present and the future in the interview situation during war: Methodological and ethical implications

stmm. 2026 (2): 172-190

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2026.02.172

Full text:

NATALIA OTRISHCHENKO, PhD in Sociology, Researcher at the Center for Urban History (6, Bohomoltsia St., Lviv, 79005)

n.otrishchenko@lvivcenter.org

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-0005

The article offers a methodological contribution to the development of longitudinal qualitative research in the context of ongoing war. It examines the situation of interaction during an in-depth interview from the perspective of the different modes of chronological time that unfold in it: memories of the past, attitudes to the present, and images of the future. The author emphasizes the dual validating role of a conversation recorded for archiving purposes: it is an opportunity for reflection in the present (situation of “between-time” as philosopher Byung-Chul Han defines it), and, through its preservation in the archive, it enables empowerment of people and communities in the future (especially through community archives as Michelle Caswell argues). The author focuses on the fact that the source of complex emotions during an interview is not only the memories of loss or powerlessness in the past, but also the violence unfolding in the present and anxiety about the future: personal and collective. The very radical openness of the future in the conditions of full-scale Russian aggression against Ukraine is a factor of tension and the risk of potential misuse of recordings when disclosing certain information might cause harm to specific people. That is why interviewers’ attention should be directed to these different temporalities, and the creation of interview archives should take into account different scenarios of the future, leaving the tools of control to the witness (such as withdrawing consent or review of the conditions for preservation and access). Leaving the space for reflection on the future of archived interviews beyond signing informed consent proves to be a very productive practice that helps create a more participatory academic culture. Through elaborated communication between interviewers and interviewees, it is possible to build not only interpersonal trust but also trust in institutions that preserve and curate collected materials. Ultimately, the key attention should be paid to the community that creates the archive, and that forms around it.

Keywords: archive, documentation, future, interview, temporality, war

References:

1. Ahmad, J. (2025). Not in a single voice: my generation's task of writing Syria's history. [In Ukrainian]. Re/visions. Retrieved from: https://revisionsjournal.com/page/not-in-a-single-voice.

2. Bevzenko, L. (2025). Sociology of the expected future in domestic realities - in search of an epistemological basis (part 1). [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 2, 135-152. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2025.02.135

3. Cave, M. (2014). Introduction. What Remains: Reflections on Crisis Oral History, 1-16. In: M. Cave, S. M., Sloan (Eds.), Listening on the Edge: Oral History in the Aftermath of Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Collins, S.G. (2008). All Tomorrow's Cultures: Anthropological Engagements with the Future. Oxford: Berghahn.

5. Corden, A., Millar, J. (2007). Qualitative Longitudinal Research for Social Policy - Introduction to Themed Section. Social Policy & Society, 6(4), 529-532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746407003867

6. Dionigi, F., Howlett, M., Tapscott, R., Otrishchenko, N., Akello, G., Mukherjee, M., Shesterinina, A. (2025). Forum: Rethinking Ethics Review for International Relations Research. International Studies Perspectives, ekaf004. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaf004

7. Haletska, I., Senyk, O. (2020). Psychology of reflection and experience of time. [In Ukrainian]. In: Horizons of Science II. Histories of Time / Ed. by Yu. Holovatch, Ya. Hrytsak, B. Novosyadlyj (pp. 83-103). Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University.

8. Grele, R.J. (2000 [1975]). Movement without aim: methodological and theoretical problems in oral history. In: The Oral History Reader / Ed. by R. Perks, A. Thomson (pp. 38-52). London; New York: Routledge.

9. Gubrium, A., Harper, K. (2013). Participatory Visual and Digital Methods. New York; London: Routledge.

10. Han, B. (2015). The Burnout Society. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

11. Han, B. (2024). The Crisis of Narration. Cambridge: Polity.

12. Hartog, F. (2005). Time and Heritage. Museum International, 57(3), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0033.2005.00525.x

13. Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.

14. Kutsenko, O. (2025). Breaking the boundaries: How war redefines the sociologist and sociology (case of Ukraine). [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 4, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2025.04.029

15. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 2nd. edn. Sage.

16. Kwiecińska, E., Łukianow, M. (2025). Multiple Positionalities of a Researcher: The Case of Polish Researchers Interviewing Ukrainian War Refugees in Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 58(3), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2025.2464169

17. Leavy, P. (2011). Oral History: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195395099.001.0001

18. Le Guin, U. (2024 [1980]). Some Thoughts on Narrative. [In Ukrainian]. Kontur. Retrieved from: https://kontur.media/ursula_le_guin/

19. Łukianow, M., Wylegała, A. (2023). Whether, when, and how? Research and documentation of the fate of women war refugees from Ukraine in Poland. [In Polish]. Culture and Society, 67, 3, 9-40. https://doi.org/10.35757/KiS.2023.67.3.1

20. Matviyenko, S., Larin, D. (2025). The Edge of Evidence: On the Labour of Witnessing. In: Images and Objects of Russia's War against Ukraine / Ed. by N. Klimenko, M. Bareikytė, V. Sereda (pp. 33-44). Bielefeld: [transcript] Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839400869-003

21. Nazaruk, T. (2025). From "dominant" to "community" archives: a new way of shaping collective memory. Conversation with Michelle Caswell. [In Ukrainian]. Re/visions. Retrieved from: https://revisionsjournal.com/page/community-archives.

22. Neale, B., Flowerdew, J. (2003). Time, texture and childhood: The contours of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(3), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000091798

23. Neale, B. (2019). What Is Qualitative Longitudinal Research? Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350188983

24. Neale, B. (2021). The Craft of Qualitative Longitudinal Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.

25. Novosyadlyj, B. (2020). The history of time: from the quantum of time to the time of the universe. [In Ukrainian]. In: Horizons of Science II. Histories of Time / Ed. by Yu. Holovatch, Ya. Hrytsak, B. Novosyadlyj (pp. 8-28). Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University.

26. Otrishchenko, N., Kharchenko, A., Shevchenko, V. (2025). Ukrainian researchers in a war documentation project: Intertwined experiences and methodologies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 58 (3), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2025.2465577

27. Otrishchenko, N. (2024a). Conversations with those who ask about war. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Center for Urban History.

28. Otrishchenko, N. (2024b). "I wanted to convey some truth": Motives for participating in oral documentation of the war. [In Ukrainian]. In: War, Science and Emotions: The (Un)spoken. Collection of materials of the International Workshop (Chernihiv, February 21-22, 2024) / Ed. by S. Makhovska (pp. 25-32). Kyiv: TOV "Yurka Liubchenka".

29. Ritchie, D.A. (2014). Doing Oral History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30. Rosenthal, G. (2008). The healing power of storytelling: on the question of the conditions of storytelling in the context of research and therapy. [In Ukrainian]. East/West, 11-12, 42-58.

31. Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216409625

32. Schütz, A., Luckman, T. (2018 [1975]). The Structures of the Life-World. [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Folio.

33. Shumylovych, B., Makhanets, O., Nazaruk, T., Otrishchenko, N., Brunow, D. (2022). Preserving the now! Mediating memories and archiving experiences in Ukraine. NECSUS European Journal of Media Studies, 11 (2), 126-149.

34. Skyba-Yakubova, I. (2024). We need other dictionaries. A conversation with Kateryna Botanova. [In Ukrainian]. Dwutygodnik.com. Strona kultury. Retrieved from: https://www.dwutygodnik.com/artykul/11519-nam-treba-inshi-slovnyky.html

35. Slim, H., Thompson, P. (1993). Listening for a change: oral testimony and development. London: Panos Publishing.

36. Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374-385.

37. Tracy, K., Robles, J.S. (2013). Everyday talk: building and reflecting identities. New York; London: The Guilford Press.

38. Tsypiashchuk, M. (2025). From de iure to de facto: legal dimensions of documenting war. [In Ukrainian]. In: Documenting the war: Between Ukraine and the world / Ed. by S. Dovzhyk, T. Nazaruk, N. Otrishchenko (pp. 109-121). Lviv: Center for Urban History.

39. Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Books.

40. von Unger, H. (2021). Ethical Reflexivity as Research Practice. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 46(2), 186-204.

41. Wylegała, A. (2022). Methodology, Ethics and Safety in Projects Documenting the War and Refugee Experience after Russia's Invasion of Ukraine on 24/02/2022. Wrocławski Rocznik Historii Mówionej, 12, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.26774/wrhm.364

Received 09.04.2026

Accepted for publication after review 22.04.2026