Identities in the “posthuman” condition: locality of war and global world

NATALIA KOSTENKO, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology of Culture and Mass Communication, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

natalia.kostenko@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-8886

“Posthuman” is considered now to be one of the most important concepts in contemporary political philosophy, cultural studies, theory of literature and art, sociology of the body and identity, etc., which keeps in focus a detailed discourse regarding the knowledge of the “posthumanity” condition (R. Braidotti, N. Gane, N.K. Hayles, F. Fukuyama, and others). This concept is no longer necessarily confined to the image of a “cyborg” as an ironic political fiction that skillfully reinvents social reality and everyday life in the context of eroding boundaries between nature and culture, or a metaphor that remains symbolically significant due to the ethical impulse and social commitment of its author (D. Haraway).

Even a fragmentary involvement in the “posthuman” discourse cannot but encourage reflection on the structure of our common identity as people in the modern global world of high technology and local wars, complex interactions between science and technology, commodification of the natural world, as well as politics and international priorities; this cannot but promote rethinking the imperatives of anthropocentrism. In the case of identities, whether individual or collective, we are talking about partial, contradictory and always open constructions, about their impossibility of relying upon a single essentialist foundation, which can be skillfully intercepted by ideological and political rhetoric but not recognize obvious social and cultural differences; however, such a foundation is unlikely to lose the image of possible unifications in future, effective attraction and solidarity-driven identifications. Depending on the degree of subjects’ involvement in the transitional states of interaction between nature and culture, identities are fragmented and “denaturalized” in various ways; and it is precisely these transitional states, flows that cross borders, whether they are defined metaphorically or instrumentally, that become, first of all, the objects of control strategies, not without activating the mechanisms of informatics of domination, ignoring local knowledge in a military context, which takes into account the status of partial explanation but does not insist on the total substantiation of statements, conclusions and perspectives.

Keywords: “posthuman” condition, anthropocentrism, methodological shifts in the binary opposition between nature and culture, cyborg, informatics of domination, D. Haraway, deferred identities, “forced feminine communities”

References

Baudrillard, J. (1996). 'Gadgets and robots'. Іn: J. Benedict (trans.), The system of objects (рр. 107-134). New York, London: Verso.

Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Campbell, N., Saren, M. (2010). The primitive, technology and horror: A posthuman biology. Ephemera, 10(2), 152-176.

Chouliaraki, L., Stolic, T. (2017). Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee "crisis": A visual typology of European news. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1162-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726163

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (2004 [1987]). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Tr. by B. Massumi. London: Continuum.

Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London: Profile Books.

Gane, N. (2006). Posthuman. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300279

Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hansen, M. (2012). Engineering Pre-individual Potentiality: Technics, Transindividuation, and 21st Century Media. SubStance, Vol. 41, 3(129), 32-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2012.0025

Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 5(2), 65-107.

Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Hayles, N.K. (2006). Unfinished Work From Cyborg to Cognisphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069229

Hayles, N.K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001

Heidegger, M. (1977[1954]). The question concerning technology. Іn: W. Lovitt (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (рр. 3-52). New York, London: Harper and Row.

Kasiyan, V. (2023). One of the leading German newspapers will replace part of the employees with artificial intelligence. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://biz.liga.net/ua/all/it/novosti/odna-iz-veduschih-nemetskih-gazet-zamenit-chast-rabotnikov-iskusstvennym-intellektom

Kostenko, N. (2022). Inside and outside of identity in the cultural experience of pandemic and war. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, marketing, methods, 2, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2022.02.005

Kostenko, N. (2022a). The Transformation of identities in wartime: Study issues and sociological practices. [In Ukrainian]. In: Ye. Golovakha, S. Makeiev (Eds.), Ukrainian Society in the Conditions of War. 2022 (рр. 305-316). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

Malešević, S. (2010). The Sociology of War and Violence Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777752

Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11

Mitrofanova, A. (2018). The cyborg as the code of a new ontology. Political and epistemological aspects of hybrid bodies. Logos, 28(4), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2018-4-109-127

Morgan, M. (2014). Rosi Braidotti. The Posthuman. Sociology, 48(1), 203-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513518669

Mugambi, J. (2019). Guns, identity, and nationhood. Palgrave communications, 5(138), 1-8. www.nature.com/palcomms https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0349-z

Madzhumdar, О. (2023). Ukrainians in Poland have become more prosperous: a new study. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://www.rbc.ua/rus/travel/ukrayintsi-polshchi-stali-bilsh-zabezpechenimi-1682072207.html

Parisi, L. (2015). Instrumental Reason, algorithmic capitalism, and the incomputable. In: M. Pasquinelli (Ed.), Alleys of Your Mind: Augmented Intellligence and Its Traumas (рр. 125-137). Lüneburg: Meson Press.

Simondon, G. (2012). Technical Mentality. Tr. by A. De Boever. In: A. De Boever, A. Murray, J. Roffe, and A. Woodward (Eds.), Gilbert Simondon Being and Technology (рр. 1-18). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University: Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748645268-003

Thompson, C.J. (2004). Marketplace mythologies and discourses of power. Journal of consumer research, 31(June), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1086/383432

Whalen, T. (2000). 'Data Navigation, Architectures of Knowledge', paper presented at the Banff Summit on Living Architectures: Designing for Immersionand Interaction, Banff New Media Institute, 23 Sept.

Received 19.08.2023