Sociocultural aspects of spatial development
stmm. 2023 (3): 152-165
DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.03.152
Full text: http://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2023-3/12.pdf
VIKTOR SHCHERBYNA, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Head of the Department of Humanities and Fundamental Disciplines, Kyiv Institute of Business and Technology (1/5, Zorianyi Lane, Kyiv, 04078)
Svn6414@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-8535
Spatial development is one of the factors in the formation of society, and the policy of conscious spatial development is the most important component of transitions to new technological and sociocultural ways of life. The article deals with the problem of theoretical understanding of spatial development, as well as the author’s concept of its study and approach to the formation of relevant policies.
The author proposes distinguishing between “developed” societies, capable of purposefully shaping their own space, and “undeveloped” ones, capable only of adapting to spontaneous changes in their own space. In the political sense, the task of spatial development is to form, through a complex impact on society, stable systemic integral formations of joint life activity.
The article highlights two strategies for spatial development — revolutionary and evolutionary. Along with them, the author proposes using the concept of the cultural diversity of society as a tool for analyzing sociocultural environments. According to the author’s approach, it is necessary to study the sociocultural environment in a particular territory as a unique composition of social practices, historically self-reproducing on the basis of typological cultural patterns — traditional, modern, and communicative.
The author comes to the conclusion that spatial development strategies focused only on one cultural pattern lead to the fact that part of the population starts to perceive the policy of implementing spatial development programs as alien to them, and this creates additional tension in the processes of transformation of societies. Therefore, in the process of deploying spatial development projects, along with economic studies on the characteristics of social space, it is necessary to conduct studies of the cultural patterns that are inherent in the people who form it.
The author believes that the harmonization of social practices that are formed on the basis of and within the framework of various cultural patterns is one of the tasks of the policy of spatial development and a factor in the sustainability of society. Therefore, cultural policy should imply comprehensive support for the development of all cultural patterns on the basis of a dialogue of cultures. Regulators from different modes of life provide social communication and exchange on the scale of familial, tribal, communal integrity, as well as on the scale of nation-state and global communities. Therefore, their support is necessary for the reproduction of society in present-day conditions.
Keywords: sociological theory; spatial development; culture; cultural patterns; globalization; crisis phenomena
References
Ambrosius, G. (2018). Globalisierung: Geschichte der internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler. Arezki, R. (2022, September 5). What will happen to the economy in the new era of national security. [In Russian]. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://forbes.kz//life/opinion/ekonomika_v_novuyu_epohu_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sociologie de l'espace social. [In Russian]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Institute of Experimental Psychology; Saint Petersburg, RF: Aleteia Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The information age: economy, society and culture, Vol. 1: The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Durkheim, E. (1995). Sociology: its subject, method, and purpose. [In Russian]. Moscow, RF: Kanon (Canon) Press.
Fuller, M.G., & Low, M. (2017). Introduction: an invitation to spatial sociology. Current Sociology, 65(4), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697461
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (2000). The presentation of self in everyday life [In Russian]. Moscow: KANON-Press-C.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. London, England: Verso.
Higano, Y., & Shibusawa, H. (1999). Agglomeration diseconomies of traffic congestion and agglomeration economies of interaction in the information-oriented city. Journal of Regional Science, 39(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00122
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Modelski, G., Devezas, T., & Thompson, W.R. (Eds.). (2008). Globalization as evolutionary process: modeling global change. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937297
Mol, A., & Law. J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (s.a.). OECD Territorial Reviews [A series of reports]. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/oecd-territorial-reviews_19900759
Richardson, T., & Jensen, O.B. (2003). Linking discourse and space: towards a cultural sociology of space in analyzing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies, 40(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220080131
Shcherbyna, V. (s.a.). Multiculturalism or cultural diversity? [In Russian]. Strategic Group Sofia. Retrieved from: http://sg-sofia.com.ua/multikulturalizm-ili-kultur-mnogoukladnost
Scheuerman, W. (2023). Globalization. In E.N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/globalization
Sheller, M. (2017). From spatial turn to mobilities turn. Current Sociology, 65(4), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697463
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Sorokin, P.A. (1992). Social stratification and mobility. [In Russian]. In: P.A. Sorokin, Human. Civilization. Society (pp. 230-332). Moscow, RF: Politizdat (Publishing House of Political Literature).
Sorokin, P.A. (2000). Social and cultural dynamics: a study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg, RF: Russian Christian Institute for the Humanities
Uchida, H., & Nelson, A. (2010). Agglomeration index: towards a new measure of urban concentration (Working paper No. 2010/29). Retrieved from the United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research website: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2010-29.pdf
United Nations. (s.a.). Day of eight billion. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/dayof8billion
World Economic Forum. (2022). Four futures for economic globalization: scenarios and their implications (White paper). Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Four_Futures_for_Economic_Globalization_2022.pdf
Received 05.04.2023
Sociocultural aspects of spatial development
stmm. 2023 (3): 152-165
DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.03.152
Full text: http://stmm.in.ua/archive/ukr/2023-3/12.pdf
VIKTOR SHCHERBYNA, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Head of the Department of Humanities and Fundamental Disciplines, Kyiv Institute of Business and Technology (1/5, Zorianyi Lane, Kyiv, 04078)
Svn6414@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-8535
Spatial development is one of the factors in the formation of society, and the policy of conscious spatial development is the most important component of transitions to new technological and sociocultural ways of life. The article deals with the problem of theoretical understanding of spatial development, as well as the author’s concept of its study and approach to the formation of relevant policies.
The author proposes distinguishing between “developed” societies, capable of purposefully shaping their own space, and “undeveloped” ones, capable only of adapting to spontaneous changes in their own space. In the political sense, the task of spatial development is to form, through a complex impact on society, stable systemic integral formations of joint life activity.
The article highlights two strategies for spatial development — revolutionary and evolutionary. Along with them, the author proposes using the concept of the cultural diversity of society as a tool for analyzing sociocultural environments. According to the author’s approach, it is necessary to study the sociocultural environment in a particular territory as a unique composition of social practices, historically self-reproducing on the basis of typological cultural patterns — traditional, modern, and communicative.
The author comes to the conclusion that spatial development strategies focused only on one cultural pattern lead to the fact that part of the population starts to perceive the policy of implementing spatial development programs as alien to them, and this creates additional tension in the processes of transformation of societies. Therefore, in the process of deploying spatial development projects, along with economic studies on the characteristics of social space, it is necessary to conduct studies of the cultural patterns that are inherent in the people who form it.
The author believes that the harmonization of social practices that are formed on the basis of and within the framework of various cultural patterns is one of the tasks of the policy of spatial development and a factor in the sustainability of society. Therefore, cultural policy should imply comprehensive support for the development of all cultural patterns on the basis of a dialogue of cultures. Regulators from different modes of life provide social communication and exchange on the scale of familial, tribal, communal integrity, as well as on the scale of nation-state and global communities. Therefore, their support is necessary for the reproduction of society in present-day conditions.
Keywords: sociological theory; spatial development; culture; cultural patterns; globalization; crisis phenomena
References
Ambrosius, G. (2018). Globalisierung: Geschichte der internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler. Arezki, R. (2022, September 5). What will happen to the economy in the new era of national security. [In Russian]. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://forbes.kz//life/opinion/ekonomika_v_novuyu_epohu_natsionalnoy_bezopasnosti
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sociologie de l'espace social. [In Russian]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Institute of Experimental Psychology; Saint Petersburg, RF: Aleteia Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The information age: economy, society and culture, Vol. 1: The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Durkheim, E. (1995). Sociology: its subject, method, and purpose. [In Russian]. Moscow, RF: Kanon (Canon) Press.
Fuller, M.G., & Low, M. (2017). Introduction: an invitation to spatial sociology. Current Sociology, 65(4), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697461
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (2000). The presentation of self in everyday life [In Russian]. Moscow: KANON-Press-C.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. London, England: Verso.
Higano, Y., & Shibusawa, H. (1999). Agglomeration diseconomies of traffic congestion and agglomeration economies of interaction in the information-oriented city. Journal of Regional Science, 39(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00122
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Modelski, G., Devezas, T., & Thompson, W.R. (Eds.). (2008). Globalization as evolutionary process: modeling global change. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937297
Mol, A., & Law. J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (s.a.). OECD Territorial Reviews [A series of reports]. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/oecd-territorial-reviews_19900759
Richardson, T., & Jensen, O.B. (2003). Linking discourse and space: towards a cultural sociology of space in analyzing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies, 40(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220080131
Shcherbyna, V. (s.a.). Multiculturalism or cultural diversity? [In Russian]. Strategic Group Sofia. Retrieved from: http://sg-sofia.com.ua/multikulturalizm-ili-kultur-mnogoukladnost
Scheuerman, W. (2023). Globalization. In E.N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/globalization
Sheller, M. (2017). From spatial turn to mobilities turn. Current Sociology, 65(4), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697463
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
Sorokin, P.A. (1992). Social stratification and mobility. [In Russian]. In: P.A. Sorokin, Human. Civilization. Society (pp. 230-332). Moscow, RF: Politizdat (Publishing House of Political Literature).
Sorokin, P.A. (2000). Social and cultural dynamics: a study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg, RF: Russian Christian Institute for the Humanities
Uchida, H., & Nelson, A. (2010). Agglomeration index: towards a new measure of urban concentration (Working paper No. 2010/29). Retrieved from the United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research website: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2010-29.pdf
United Nations. (s.a.). Day of eight billion. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/dayof8billion
World Economic Forum. (2022). Four futures for economic globalization: scenarios and their implications (White paper). Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Four_Futures_for_Economic_Globalization_2022.pdf
Received 05.04.2023