Institute of Sociology NASU

INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF IDENTITY IN THE CULTURAL EXPERIENCE OF PANDEMIC AND WAR

stmm. 2022 (2): 5-21

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2022.02.005

NATALIA KOSTENKO, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology of Culture and Mass Communication, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

natalia.kostenko@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-8886

Despite the widespread understanding of identity as “the meaning of oneself” (S. Huntington), it remains an opaque concept that firmly holds a double identity — a simultaneous reference to uniqueness in the subject (identity to oneself), singularity and to sameness (identity as an analogy to a norm, type, class, collective pattern). This key paradox, the contextual dependence of this concept, is cultivated not only within scientific discourse, but also in the habitual gesture of public rhetoric, which tirelessly “calls things by their proper names”. Based on modern ideas about the production of identities through the "politics of resentment" (F. Fukuyama), "politics of the street" (J. Butler) or "politics of vulnerability" (L. Chouliaraki), the article examines the transformation of cultural identities in Ukrainian society in recent years. The fragmentation and multimodality of identities in the state of the coronavirus pandemic is due to the testing of new formats of global and local interactions against the backdrop of changes in information regimes, forced closure of national territories and actively implemented biopolitics. The event of Russia’s military invasion divided the space and time of existence into "we" and "they", overcoming the uncertainty and multiplicity of previous reactions of individual and collective subjects, turned participation in society, the fact of citizenship into an existential experience of people, formed the Ukrainian project as a model of identity, with a clearer than before value credo of "freedom, dignity, security." The near future will show how the mastered practices for producing identities will be sustainable and effective in the conditions of the “new normality”, what are the risks of their modifications.

Keywords: identity, individual and collective identities, identity politics, Ukrainian project, citizenship as an existential experience, constructivism, essentialism

References

1. Butler, J. (2018). Notes on the performative theory of the assembly. [In Russian]. Moscow: Ad Marginem. [=Батлер 2018]
2. Bauman, Z. (1990). Modernity and Ambivalence. Theory, Culture & Society, 7 (2–3), 143–169.
3. Bauman, Z. (1996). From Pilgrim to Tourist — or a Short History of Identity. In: Questions of Cultural Identity / Ed. by St. Hall, P. du Gay (pp. 18–36). London: SAGE Publications.
4. Boski, P., Strus, K., Tiaga, E. (2013). Cultural identity, existential anxiety, and traditionalism. E-books. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080115124948/http://ebooks.iaccp.org/ongoing_themes/chapters/boski/boski.php?file=boski&output=screen
5. Brown, A. (2017). What is hate speech? Part 1: The myth of hate. Law and Philosophy, 36 (4), 419–468.
6. Brubaker, R (2006). Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Chouliaraki, L. (2021). Victimhood: The affective politics of vulnerability. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24 (1), 10–27.
8. Corfield, P. (2021). Being Assessed as a Whole Person: A Critique of Identity Politics. Academia Letters, Art. 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL101
9. Davis, J.L., Love, T.P., Fares, Ph. (2019). Collective Social Identity: Synthesizing Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory Using Digital Data. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82 (3), 254–273
10. Elias, N. (2001). Society of individuals. [In Russian]. Moscow: Praxis. [=Элиас 2001]
11. Erikson, E. (1994). Identity and the life cycle. New York; London: W.W. Norton & Company.
12. Featherstone, M. (2020). Problematizing the Global: An Introduction to Global Culture Revisited. The Theory, Culture & Society special section on ‘Global Culture Revisited’. Annual Review, 37 (7–8), 157–167.
13. Fedotova, N. (2006). Cultural Identity: Multiculturalism and Development Politics. [In Russian]. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, IX (3), 75–92. [=Федотова 2006]
14. Fukuyama, F. (2019). Identity. The desire for recognition and the policy of rejection. [In Russian]. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. Retrieved from: http://loveread.ec/read_book.php?id=82792&p=1 [=Фукуяма 2019]
15. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Giesen, B., Seyfert, R. (2016). Collective identities, empty signifiers and solvable secrets. European Journal of Social Theory, 19 (1), 111–126.
17. Hall, St. (1980). Cultural Studies: two paradigms. Media, Culture & Society, 2, 57–72.
18. Kostenko, N. (2001). Cultural identities: transformations and recognitions. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 69–88. [=Костенко 2001]
19. Kostenko, N. (2020). Network Communication: Algorithmic and Risky Connection. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 5–23. [=Костенко 2020]
20. Kryvda, N., Storozhuk, S. (2018). Cultural identity as the basis of collective unity. [In Ukrainian]. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4 (8), 58–63. [=Кривда, Сторожук 2018]
21. Makeev, S.A., Oksamitnaya, S.N., Shvachko, E.V. (1996). Social Identifications and Identities. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine. [=Макеев, Оксамитная, Швачко 1996]
22. Massumi, B. (1995). The Autonomy of Affect. Cultural Critique, 31 [The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II, Autumn], 83–109.
23. Outers, J.-L. (2011). Weak identity. On the Francophone Literature of Belgium. [In Russian]. Foreign literature, 11. Retrieved from: https://magazines.gorky.media/inostran/2011/11/slabaya-identichnost.html [=Утерс 2011]
24. Poliakova, N.L. (2016). “Identity” in contemporary sociological theory. [In Russian]. Bulletin of Moscow university, Series 18. Sociology and political science, 4, 22–42. [=Полякова 2016]
25. Portrait of a completely different Ukrainian. Interview NV with Professor Libanova about fundamental changes in society. March 31, 2022. Retrieved from: https://life.nv.ua/socium/voyna-v-ukraine-kak-izmenilos-ukrainskoe-obshchestvo-intervyu-nv-s-elloy-libanovoy-50229900.html [=Портрет 2022].
26. Rutherford, J. (2007). After Identity. London: Lawrence & Wishart
27. Ricoeur, P. (1995). Hermeneutics. Ethics. Politics. Moscow lectures and interviews. [In Russian]. Мoscow: KAMI. [=Рикер 1995]
28. Sociocultural identities and practices / Ed. by A. Ruchka (2002), [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Соціокультурні ідентичності 2002]
29. Stets, J.E., Burke, P.J. (2003). A sociological apoach to self and identity. In: M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity) (pp. 128–152). S.l.: The Guilford Press.
30. Taylor, Ch. (1997). The Ethics of Authenticity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
31. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T, De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Vermenich, Y. (2016). Construction of Ukrainian identity: national and regional projects of the other half of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine, NAS of Ukraine. [=Верменич 2016]

Received 06.04.2022