Application of basics of actor-network approach to sociology of professions

The article is devoted to theoretical approaches in the domain of sociology of professions and in particular the application of the concepts of actor-network theory in the study of the phenomenon of professions. Social transformations of the late XX — early XXI centuries, and, in particular, changes in the professional structure of society lead to criticism of the profession as a category of analysis and the existing analytical apparatus of "social sociology" in the study of professions and occupations. The article lists and considers the main paradigms and approaches to the study of the phenomenon of professions in the sociological perspective, the main angles and emphases within these approaches. The text presents the basic terms and ideas of the actor-network approach as one of the sociological perspectives, presents the basic terms and concepts of this area of sociological theorizing. An attempt was made to apply the concepts of actor-network approach to the profession as a socio-technical actor network and the formation of the profession (professionalization) as a process of translation and creation of the actor network, "monopolization of expertise" by the profession as an extended network. The article presents examples of consideration of the activities of professionals and their interactions in socio-technical systems in the research of the actor-network approach and considers the possibility of applying the principles of actor-network theory in the context of research professions and professional structure of society. An attempt is made to generalize the characteristics and activities of professionals carried out in the framework of research in the actor-network approach and find potential starting points for the study of professions in line with actor-network theory. Socio-technological nature of professions, the existence of the profession as a network of interactions and at the same time a professional as an actor in other networks, the length of networks of expert knowledge as the dominant way to explain phenomena, can be considered as general principles of professional activity.

Keywords: profession, professionalization, actor-network theory, sociomateriality, sociology of professions, modern sociological theories, modernization, labour market, modernity, employment, state, education, higher education.

References

Abramov, R. (2014). Classification of research areas in the study of occupations and professions. (analytical review). [In Russian]. Social sciences and humanities. Domestic and foreign literature. Ser. 11, Sociology: Abstract Journal, 3. [=Абрамов 2014]

Ackroyd, S. (2016). Sociological and organisational theories of professions and professionalism. In: M. Dent, L. Bourgeault, J. Denis, E. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779447

Astakhov, S. (2019). Conceptual style of Lancaster school in ANT. [In Russian]. Sociology of Power, 31 (2), 18–44. DOI: 10.22394 / 2074-0492-2019-2-18-44 [=Астахов 2019]

Brown, J.S., Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline Issues: Social and Material Aspects of Design. Hum. Comput. Interact., 9, 3–36.

Callon, M. (2017). Some elements of the sociology of translation: the domestication of scallops and fishermen of the Bay of Saint-Brieuc. [In Russian]. Philosophical and Literary Journal "Logos", 27 (2 (117)), 49–94. [=Каллон 2017]

Cresswell, K.M., Worth, A., Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10 (1). DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-10-67

Diomin, T. (2019). Bruno Latour and analytical epistemology. [In Russian]. Sociology of Power, 31 (2), 116–135. DOI: 10.22394 / 2074-0492-2019-2-116-135 [=Демин 2019]

Fenwick, T.J. (2010). (un)Doing standards in education with actor‐network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25 (2), 117–133. DOI: 10.1080/02680930903314277

Justesen, L., Mouritsen, J. (2011). Effects of actor-network theory in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24, 161–193. DOI: 10.1108/09513571111100672

Kurtz, T. (2021). The End of the Profession as a Sociological Category? Systems-theoretical Remarks on the Relationship between Profession and Society. Am. Sociol., Apr. 30, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09483-3

Kutuev, P.V. (2016). Transformations of modernism: Institutions, ideas, ideologies: monograph. [In Ukrainian]. S.l.: Helvetica Publishing House. [=Кутуєв 2016]

Latour, B. (2013). Science in action: following engineers and scientists within society. [In Russian] St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg. [=Латур 2013]

Latour, B. (2020). Partitioning the social: an introduction to actor-network theory.translated from English I. Polonskaya. [In Russian]. Moscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics. [=Латур, 2020]

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems practice, 5, 379–393.

Mansurov, V., Yurchenko, O. (2009). Sociology of professions. History, methodology and practice of research. [In Russian]. Sociological Research, 8 (August 2009), 36–46. [=Мансуров, Юрченко 2009]

Monteiro, A.R. (2015) Sociology of the Professions. In: The Teaching Profession. Springer Briefs in Education. S.l.: Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12130-7_4

O'Connell, B., Ciccotosto, S., and De Lange, P. (2014) Understanding the application of Actor-Network Theory in the process of accounting change. In: Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. 7–9 July 2014, Toronto, Canada.

Parsons, T. (2016). Professions and social structure. Sociological Yearbook, 2015/2016. 172–186. [=Парсонс 2016]

Pettersen, I. J., Morland C., Burges T. (2018). Translating Technological Change – Implementing technology into a hospital. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, May. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0157

Primo, A., Zago, G. (2014). Who And What Do Journalism? Digital Journalism, 3 (1), 38–52. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2014.927987

Ritzer, G. (Ed.) (2005). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. S.l.: SAGE Publications.

Stichweh, R. (1997). Professions in modern society. International Review of Sociology, 7. 95–102. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.1997.9971225.

Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building. Organization, 7 (2), 311–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072007

Received 08.02.2022