Institute of Sociology NASU

LABOR IN THE 21ST CENTURY: CHALLENGES OF POST-FORDISM / NEOLIBERALISM AND THE SITUATION OF WORKING PEOPLE IN THE MODERN GLOBAL WORLD

stmm. 2021 (1): 60-81

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2021.01.060

VITALINA BUTKALIUK, Candidate of Sciences in Sociology, Research Fellow at the Department of Economic Sociology, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

vbutkalyuk@ukr.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-6393

The article examines the current problems of the global sphere of work and employment. The author historically assesses the causes and consequences of the structural transformations of the economy and social and labor relations as a result of the transition of the capitalist economy from fordism and keynesianism to post-fordism and neoliberalism at the end of the 20th century. Based on the analysis of a significant array of statistical and sociological information the author concludes that in the conditions of neoliberal economic globalization, labor has undergone significant changes in comparison with the period of the "glorious post-war thirty years" of capitalism. The implementation of radical economic reforms has led to an increase in employment vulnerability and a decrease in the quality of working life for many categories of workers in the modern world. The decline in the share of labor in GDP, the lag in wage growth rates from labor productivity, and the widespread incidence of informal and vulnerable employment, characteristic of this period, have become the main reasons for the growth of socioeconomic inequality and widespread poverty and poverty in the working environment in recent decades. Having considered the impact of the current process of automation, robotization and digitalization of the global economy, the author concludes that without changing the socio-economic and political configuration of the structure of the modern world, the potentially high utility of the latest achievements of science and technology will be significantly limited and subordinated mainly to the economic interests of capital owners, and will not work for the benefit of all humanity and social progress. The article pays special attention to studying the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of their impact on the position of employees in the modern world.

Full article: ukr | rus

Keywords: post-Fordism, neoliberalism, labor, social relations in the world of work, socio-economic inequality, labour inequality

References

1. 57 professions will disappear, and new 186 will appear (2019). [In Russian]. In: Atlas of New Professions. Retrieved from: https://osvitanova.com.ua/posts/2361-yscheznut-57-professyi-a-poiaviatsia-novye-186-atlas-novykh-professyi [Исчезнут 2019]
2. Anisimov, R.N. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on the social structure of society (problems and consequences). [In Russian]. In: Efficiency of labor and quality of working life of the XXI century: collection of scientific articles (pp. 8-16). Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20953/1729-9225-2020-2-112-116 [=Анисимов 2020]
3. Arseenko, A., Petrushina, T. (2014). USA and Ukraine: scenarios of deindustrialization. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 23–47. [=Арсеєнко, Петрушина 2014]
4. Arseenko, A.G. (2020). Digitalization of the global neoliberal economy as it is. In: Efficiency of labor and the quality of working life of the XXI century: collection of scientific articles (pp. 16–24). [In Russian]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. https://doi.org/10.20953/1729-9225-2020-2-112-116 [=Арсеенко 2020]
5. Atkinson, A. (2018). Inequality: how to deal with it? [In Russian]. Moscow: PH "Dielo". [=Аткинсон 2018]
6. Bell, D. (1974). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
7. Change in the nature of work. World Development Report 2019. [In Russuan]. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank. [Изменение 2019]
8. COVID-19 and Human Development: Assessing the Crisis, Envisioning the Recovery. 2020 Human Development Perspectives (2020). New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.18356/161b9678-en
9. Decent work (2018). International Labour Organization. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang--en/index.htm
10. Equality. The International Labour Organization (s.a.). [In Russian]. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/moscow/dw4sd/themes/equality/lang-ru/index.htm#19 [=Равенство s.a.]
11. Florida, R. (2018). Homo creativus. How does the new class conquer the world. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Nash format. [=Флорида 2018]
12. Ford, M. (2016). Six robots. Technology and the threat of potential security. [In Ukraine]. Kyiv: Nash format. [=Форд 2016]
13. Global Employment Trends for Youth, 2017: Paths to a better working future (2018). International Labour Organisation. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_598675.pdf
14. Guterres, A. (2020). Tackling the pandemic of inequality: a new social contract for a new era. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/ru/coronavirus/tackling-inequality-new-social-contract-new-era [=Гутерриш 2020]
15. Guterres: The pandemic has exposed acute problems, including the danger of bioterrorism. [In Russian]. UN News. Retrieved from: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2020/07/1381332
16. Haque, I. (2004). Globalization, Neoliberalism and Labour. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, no. 173.
17. Hartman, D. (2015). Postmodernism or the logic of post-Fordism culture? [In Russian]. Postfordism: Concepts, Institutions, Practices. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia. Отримано з: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24645625 [=Гартман 2015]
18. Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Actual reading. [In Russian]. Moscow: Pokolienie. [=Харви 2007]
19. ILO (2020). COVID-19 and the world of work. ILO Newsletter: Iss. 4: Updated estimates and analysis, May 27. [In Russian]. [=Международная организация труда 2020]
20. ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization (2008). Geneva, June 10. [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677117.063 [=Декларация 2008]
21. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work Updated estimates and analysis (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_740877.pdf
22. Martyanov, V.S. (2015). Postfordism: Scientific Theory or the Latest Social Utopia? [In Russian]. In: Postfordism: concepts, institutions, practices. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia. Retrieved from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24645625 [=Мартьянов 2015]
23. Marx, K. (1978). The process of capital production. [In Russian]. In: K. Marx, Capital. Criticism of Political Economy (vol. 1, book 1). Moscow: Politizdat. [=Маркс 1978]
24. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
25. Measuring Unemployment and Potential Labour Force in LFSs: Main Findings from the ILO LFS Pilot Studies. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_627878.pdf
26. Our response to globalization: the Decent Work Agenda. [In Russian]. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/moscow/news/WCMS_655937/lang-ru/index.htm [=Наш ответ 2018]
27. Shevchuk, A.V. (2000). Postfordist concepts (critical analysis). [In Russian]. Retrieved from: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/634/686/1219/Shevchuk_PostfordistTheories2000.pdf [=Шевчук 2000]
28. Sociological encyclopedic dictionary (1998). [In Russian]. Moscow: INFRA-M NORMA. [=Социологический 1998]
29. Sociology of Labor. Theoretical and Applied Explanatory Dictionary (2006). [In Russian]. St. Petersburg: Nauka. [=Социология 2006]
30. Special Eurobarometer 460. Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life. European Union (2017). Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/%D0%92%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0/Downloads/ebs_460_sum_en.pdf
31. Statistics on labour income and inequality (2019). ILOSTAT. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/labour-income/
32. Stiglitz, J. (2020). Bridging the great divide. The pandemic has revealed profound differences, but it's not too late to change course. Finance & Development, September. [In Russian]. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/russian/pubs/ft/fandd/2020/09/pdf/COVID19-and-global-inequality-joseph-stiglitz.pdf [=Стиглиц 2020]
33. Stiglitz, J. (2020). People, Power, and Profits. Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. Moscow: Alpina Publisher.
34. The Global Labor Income Share and Distribution (2019). Data Production and Analysis Unit, ILO Department of Statistics Key Findings. International Labour Office, July. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_712232.pdf
35. The Productivity–Pay Gap (2019). Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/
36. Toffler, A. (1981). The Third Wave. Toronto, New York, London, Sydney: Bantam Books.
37. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2020). Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
38. Webster, Fr. (2004). Information Society Theories. [In Russian]. Moscow: Aspect Press. [=Уэбстер 2004]
39. What Worries the World?: COVID-19 is the biggest concern for the eighth successive month (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-11/www-pr-november-2020.pdf
40. Work for a better future. Global Commission on the Future of Work (2019). [In Russian]. Geneva: International Labor Office. [=Работать 2019]
41. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2019 (2019). International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO.
42. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2020 (2020). International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO.
43. Yelmeev, V.Ya. (2007). Social Labor Economy: General Foundations of Political Economy. [In Russian]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House. [=Ельмеев 2007]
44. Youth Forum at the UN: without the participation of young people cannot solve the problems of humanity (2019). UN News. [In Russian]. Retrieved from: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2019/04/1352771 [=Молодежный форум 2019]

Received 29.01.2021