Institute of Sociology NASU

SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL STATUSES OF THE UKRAINIANS: CHANGES OVER TIME (2009–2019)

stmm. 2021 (1): 5-24

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2021.01.005

ELENA SIMONCHUK, Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Leading Research Fellow at the Social Structures Department, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

elena@simonchuk.kiev.ua

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-2387

The article examines the dynamics of social status self-evaluations of the Ukrainians based on two waves (2009 and 2019) of the Social Inequality module of International Social Survey Programme. Three types of social status self-evaluation in different biographical situations were noted: the current one (at the time of the survey), the retrospective one (of the parents’ family status) and the perspective one (status of oneself in 10 years’ time). They were measured through the respondents’ self-determination of their appropriate status on an imaginary 10-step social ladder. The noticeable changes for the better in the current social status self-evaluations of the Ukrainians are stated, which is visualized in changing the diagram of their distribution from pyramidal shape (where the lower-middle and the lowest positions are the basic ones) to the close to rhombus shape (where the majority is concentrated on the middle levels). The retrospective self-evaluations still demonstrate negative situation: the respondents mostly perceive the social status of parents’ families as higher than their current status. At the same time, the perspective self-evaluations of the Ukrainians are rather optimistic: majority of them hope to significantly increase their own status in the social hierarchy in the next decade. A connection between the class positions (both objectively and subjectively determined) and the status self-evaluations of three kinds was also studied. It is recorded that in both years of the survey this connection remains quite significant and expected in nature. Regarding EGP-classes: representatives of service classes and small owners had significantly higher current, retrospective and prospective self-evaluations than working-class people, primarily unskilled workers and farm labours. Regarding the subjective classes defined by nominal categories (upper middle, middle, lower middle, working, lower class): the higher the subjective class position a person has, the higher he/she evaluates his/her social status.

Full article: ukr | rus

Keywords: social status, social status self-evaluations, objective and subjective class, Ukraine

References

1. Berger, R., Grusky, D., Raffel, T., Samuels, G., Wimer, C. (2010). The inequality puzzle: European and US leaders discuss rising income inequality. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15804-9
2. Bottero, W. (2019). A sense of inequality. London: Rowman Littlefield International.
3. Evans, G. (1993). Class conflict and inequality. International Social Attitudes: the 10th BSA report (рр. 123–142).
4. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P., Treiman, D. J., De Leeuw, J. (1992). A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089x(92)90017-b
5. Gimpelson, V., Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics Politics, 30(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103
6. Harrop, M., Miller, W. L. (1987). Elections and voters. A comparative introduction. Red Globe Press.
7. Irwin, S. (2018). Lay perceptions of inequality and social structure. Sociology. 52(2), 211–227.
8. Jary, D., Jary, J. (1999). Collins Dictionary in sociology. In 2 vol. Vol. 2 (P – Ya). [In Russian]. Moscow: Vieche, AST. [=Джери, Джери 1999]
9. Kelly, C., Kelly, C. (2009). Subjective social mobility: data from 30 nations. In: M. Haller, R. Jowell, T. Smith (Eds.), Charting the globe: The International Social Survey Programme 1984–2009 (рр. 106–124). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880050
10. Khakhulina, L. (1999). Subjective middle class: income, financial status, value orientations. [In Russian]. Monitoring obschestvennogo mnenia: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyie peremeny, 2 (40), 24–33.
11. Kovalisko, N., Makeev, S. (2020). Diversity and relative autonomy of of Ukrainian population’ beliefs about social inequality. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 3, 33–50. [=Коваліско, Макеєв 2020] https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2020.03.033
12. Lenski G. (1954). Status crystallization: A non-vertical dimension of social status. American Sociological Review, 19, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087459
13. Lenski, G. E. (1966). Power and privilege. A theory of social stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
14. Lindemann, K., Saar, E. (2014). Contextual effects on subjective social position: Evidence from European countries. International Journal of Comparative Studies, 55(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715214527101
15. Lu Xueyi. (2010). Dangdai zhongguo shehui jiegou: [The modern social structure of China]. Beijing.
16. Makeev, S., Oksamytna, S., Shvachko, Ye. (1996). Social identifications and identities. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Макеев, Оксамитная, Швачко 1996]
17. Makeev, S., Oksamytna, S. (2001). Trends in the formation of the middle class. [In Ukrainian]. In: V. Vorona, M. Shulga (Eds.), Ukrainian society: ten years of independence (pp. 278–285). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Макеєв, Оксамитна 2001]
18. Makeev, S., Simonchuk, E. (2014). Class structure of modern society. [In Ukrainian]. In: V. Vorona, M. Shulga (Eds.), Vectors of changes in Ukrainian society (pp. 110–134). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Макеєв, Симончук 2014]
19. Malysh, L. (2019). Principles and rules for measuring structural inequalities in sociology. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. [=Малиш, 2019]
20. Meraviglia, C. (2017). The social ladder. Status mobility across time and countries. In: J. Edlund, I. Bechert, M. Quandt (Eds.), Social inequality in the eyes of the public: a collection of analyses based on ISSP data 1987–2009 (рр. 13–34). Köln: GESIS.
21. Oksamytna, S. (2011). Intergenerational class and educational mobility. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: NaUKMA, Agrar Media Group. [=Оксамитна 2011]
22. Oksamytna, S., Brodska S. (2001). Class self-identification of Ukrainian population. [In Ukrainian]. Naukovi zapyski NaUKMA, 19, 44–50. [=Оксамитна, Бродська 2001]
23. Pain K. (2017). The Broken Ladder: how inequality affects the way we think, live, and die. New York: Viking.
24. Pribytkova, I. (2006). New status nominations: poor-middle-rich. In: S. Makeev (Ed.), New social inequalities (pp. 168–194). [In Russian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Прибыткова 2006]
25. Simonchuk, E. (1999). Dynamics of self-evaluations of social status. [In Ukrainian]. In: M. Shulga (Ed.), Ukrainian society on the threshold of the third millennium (pp. 525–540). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Симончук 1999]
26. Simonchuk, E. (2003). Middle class: people and statuses. [In Russian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Симончук 2003]
27. Simonchuk, E. (2006). Status self-evaluations of Ukrainian population in comparative and temporal contexts. [In Ukrainian]. In: V. Vorona, M. Shulga (Eds.), Ukrainske suspilstvo 1992–2006. Sotsiolohichnyi monitoryng (pp. 11–21). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Симончук 2006]
28. Simonchuk, E. (2018). Social classes in modern societies: the heuristic potential of class analysis. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [=Симончук 2018]
29. Simonchuk, E. (2020a). Dynamics of Ukrainians' perceptions of social structure and their place in it. [In Ukrainian]. In: S. Oksamytna, E. Simonchuk (Eds.), Dynamics of perception of social inequality in Ukraine: according to the data of the International Social Survey Program, 2009 and 2019 (pp. 83–127). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp10.02.135 [=Симончук 2020а]
30. Simonchuk, E. (2020b). Class dimension of perception of social inequality. [In Ukrainian]. In: S. Oksamytna, E. Simonchuk (Eds.), Dynamics of perception of social inequality in Ukraine: according to the data of the International Social Survey Program, 2009 and 2019 (pp. 131–178). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp10.02.135 [=Симончук 2020b]
31. Simonchuk, E., Oksamytna, S. (2020). Social inequality in the mirror of the International Social Survey Program. [In Ukrainian]. In: S. Oksamytna, E. Simonchuk (Eds.), Dynamics of perception of social inequality in Ukraine: according to the data of the International Social Survey Program, 2009 and 2019 (pp. 7–17). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. https://doi.org/10.15407/hftp10.02.135 [=Симончук, Оксамитна 2020]
32. Smith, T. (1986). Internationally comparable measurement of subjective social class. Presentation to the planning meeting of the International Social Survey Program. April, Mannheim, Germany.
33. Smith, T. (1989). Inequality and welfare. In: R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon, L. Brook (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: special international report. Aldershot: Gower.
34. Smith, T. (1992). An analysis of response patterns to the ten-point scalometer (GSS Methodological report No 76). National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Chicago.
35. Sobel, M. M., De Graaf, M. D., Heath, A., Zou, Y. (2004). Men matter more: the social class identity of married British women. 1985–1991. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 167(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0964-1998.2003.00710.x
36. Sorokin, P. (1996). Man. Civilization. Society. [In Russian]. Moscow: Politizdat. [=Сорокин 1996]
37. Therborn, G. (2020). Dreams and nightmares of the middle classes of the world: transl. from Engl. by P. Shopin. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: https://commons.com.ua/en/mriyi-ta-koshmari-serednih-klasiv-svitu/[=Терборн 2020]
38. Treiman, D. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.

Received 19.10.2020