LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

Foundations of a neo-Marxist class analysis

stmm. 2019 (1): 9-31

UDC 316.342.2

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2019.01.009

ERIK OLIN WRIGHT

Abstract. The author lays out the distinctive features of a neo-Marxist class approach used in present-day sociology. First, he clarifies what exactly constitutes the fundamental point of class analysis within the Marxist framework and what it tries to accomplish. This work also provides a description of similarities and differences between the Weberian and Marxist traditions with regard to the conceptual components and pivotal explanatory ambitions. The distinctive hallmark of the Marxian approach is that it defines the concept of social class in terms of exploitation. In Wright’s view, the theoretical pay-off of elaborating the Marxian-inspired conception of class, which is
based on social relations of production on the one hand and exploitation and domination on the other, is that this conception infuses class analysis with moral critique. Such an analysis can function not simply as part of a scientific theory of interests and conflicts, but also as a constituent of an emancipatory theory offering alternatives to capitalism on the basis of social justice.

Keywords: social class, class analysis, Marxism, exploitation, social relations of production, class relations, class locations

Publication in: ukr | rus

References

Burawoy, Michael, and Erik Olin Wright, 2001 “Sociological Marxism,” pp. 459-86 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_22

Carchedi, Guglielmo, 1977 The Economic Identification of Social Classes, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Cohen, G. A., 1978 Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Cohen, G. A., 1995 Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Poulantzas, Nicos, 1974 Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, Verso.

Poulantzas, Nicos, 1975 Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, New Left Books.

Resnick, Stephen, and Richard Wolff, 1987 Knowledge and Class, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Swift, Adam, 2001 Equality, Freedom and Community, Cambridge, UK, Polity.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1978 Class, Crisis and the State, London, New Left Books.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1985 Classes, London, New Left Books/Verso.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1997 Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis,Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939804100220

Wright, Erik Olin, 2000 “Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests and Class Compromise,” American Journal of Sociology 105:4 (January), pp. 957-1,002. https://doi.org/10.1086/210397

Wright, Erik Olin, Andrew Levine, and Elliott Sober, 1993 Reconstructing Marxism, London, Verso. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100001590

Wright, Erik Olin et al., 1989 The Debate on Classes, London, Verso.

Foundations of a neo-Marxist class analysis

stmm. 2019 (1): 9-31

UDC 316.342.2

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2019.01.009

ERIK OLIN WRIGHT

Abstract. The author lays out the distinctive features of a neo-Marxist class approach used in present-day sociology. First, he clarifies what exactly constitutes the fundamental point of class analysis within the Marxist framework and what it tries to accomplish. This work also provides a description of similarities and differences between the Weberian and Marxist traditions with regard to the conceptual components and pivotal explanatory ambitions. The distinctive hallmark of the Marxian approach is that it defines the concept of social class in terms of exploitation. In Wright’s view, the theoretical pay-off of elaborating the Marxian-inspired conception of class, which is
based on social relations of production on the one hand and exploitation and domination on the other, is that this conception infuses class analysis with moral critique. Such an analysis can function not simply as part of a scientific theory of interests and conflicts, but also as a constituent of an emancipatory theory offering alternatives to capitalism on the basis of social justice.

Keywords: social class, class analysis, Marxism, exploitation, social relations of production, class relations, class locations

Publication in: ukr | rus

References

Burawoy, Michael, and Erik Olin Wright, 2001 “Sociological Marxism,” pp. 459-86 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner, New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_22

Carchedi, Guglielmo, 1977 The Economic Identification of Social Classes, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Cohen, G. A., 1978 Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Cohen, G. A., 1995 Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Poulantzas, Nicos, 1974 Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, Verso.

Poulantzas, Nicos, 1975 Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, New Left Books.

Resnick, Stephen, and Richard Wolff, 1987 Knowledge and Class, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Swift, Adam, 2001 Equality, Freedom and Community, Cambridge, UK, Polity.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1978 Class, Crisis and the State, London, New Left Books.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1985 Classes, London, New Left Books/Verso.

Wright, Erik Olin, 1997 Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis,Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939804100220

Wright, Erik Olin, 2000 “Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests and Class Compromise,” American Journal of Sociology 105:4 (January), pp. 957-1,002. https://doi.org/10.1086/210397

Wright, Erik Olin, Andrew Levine, and Elliott Sober, 1993 Reconstructing Marxism, London, Verso. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267100001590

Wright, Erik Olin et al., 1989 The Debate on Classes, London, Verso.

LATEST PRINTED ISSUE

LATEST FREELY ACCESSIBLE MATERIALS

} } } } }