Socio-demographic factors of Ukrainians’ attitude to the judiciary

stmm. 2020 (2): 42-56



Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Senior Research Fellow, Head of the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)


Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, Research Fellow at the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (12, Shovkovychna St., Kyiv, 01021)

The article analyzes the socio-demographic determinants of Ukrainian citizens’ attitude to the judiciary identified on the basis of a nationwide survey. The sociological specifics of the analysis provided for the verification of the influence of those factors that reflect the consequences of social stratification in a particular society — its socio-economic, political and socio-cultural dimensions. In different countries of the world, the influence of socio-demographic factors on the attitude to the judiciary has been uneven and unequal. In many European countries, the experience of cooperating with the courts leads to a negative attitude towards justice. The attitude to the judiciary is considered through four indicators: 1) trust in the courts; 2) assessment of the chances of winning court case, regardless of the wealth of the citizen; 3) assessment of an independence of judges; 4) assessment of an integrity of judges. Despite social optimism observed in Ukrainian society after the 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections, the study found a low level of trust and negative assessments of Ukrainian justice. Using the method of multiple linear regression, it was found that public opinion about justice is formed regardless of gender, level of education and region of residence. It was found that Ukrainians’ attitude to the judiciary is largely determined by age, settlement type, language of communication at home and experience of participation in the trial. Confidence and positive assessments assessments of the judiciary are mainly manifested as the age and size of the settlement decrease, as well as among Russian speakers and those who have experience of participating in the trial. The influence of the respondents’ financial situation on their assessment of the independence of judges was unexpectedly dependent: as the financial situation of the family decreased, the tendency to consider judges independent increased.

Keywords: attitude to the judiciary, socio-demographic factors, Ukraine.


American Bar Association (1999). Perceptions of the U.S. Justice System. Chicago: American Bar Association.

Amjadin, L., Goncharuk, O., Kravchenko, O. (2005). Judicial system and courts in Ukraine in public assessments (comprehensive sociological research) / Yu. Pryvalov, Yu. Saenko (Eds.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Precedent. [= Амджадін, Гончарук, Кравченко 2005]

Brown, D. (2005). How does England incorporate the results of public opinion surveys on the administration of justice? In: S. Parmentier, G. Vervaeke, R. Doutrelepont, G. Kellens (Eds.), Public opinion and the administration of justice: Popular perceptions and their implications for policy-making in Western countries (pp. 169–186). Brussels: Politeia.

Centre of Policy and Legal Reform (2019). Judicial reform through the eyes of citizens: what can positively affect trust in the court? Survey results, June 2019. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: [= Центр 2019]

Golovakha, Ye., Gorbachyk, A. (2014). Trends in Social Changes in Ukraine and Europe: Outcomes of European Social Survey 2005–2007–2009–2011–2013. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine. [= Головаха, Горбачик 2014]

Kushnirenko, V., Pen’kova, K. (2014). Electiveness of judges and participation of lay judges in the trial: international practice and conclusions for Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Retrieved from: [= Кушніренко, Пенькова, 2014]

National Center for State Courts (1999). How the public views the State Courts. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Public Policy Center.

Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rottman, D.B., Tomkins, A.J. (1999). Public trust and confidence in the courts: What public opinion surveys mean to judges. Court Review, fall, 24–31.

Sherman, L.W. (2002). Trust and confidence in criminal justice. National Institute of Justice Journal, 284, 22–31.

The KIIS (2018). Thoughts and views of the Ukrainian population on judicial reform, September 2018. Retrieved from:\.

The Razumkov Centre (2019). Attitudes of Ukrainian citizens to the judicial system, June 24, 2019. Retrieved from:

Tufts, J. (2000). Public attitudes toward the criminal justice system. Juristat, 20 (12), 1–22.

Ukrainian society: monitoring of social change (2014). Iss. 1 (15): In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Tables and graphs. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine. [= Українське суспільство 2014]

Van de Walle, S., Raine, J.W. (2008). Explaining attitudes towards the justice system in the UK and Europe (Ministry of Justice Research Series 9/08). Retrieved from:

Vyshniak, O. (2010). Trust in Political Institutions: Concepts, Indicators and Trends in Change. [In Ukrainian]. In: V. Vorona, M. Shulga (Eds.), Ukrainian Society 1992–2010. Sociological monitoring (pp. 24–39). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [= Вишняк 2010]

Received 26.05.2020