The subjects of civil practice as a basis for democratic transit of Ukraine

stmm. 2020 (1): 5-22

UDC 316.62:323.212

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2020.01.005

Oleksandr Reznik - Doctor of Sciences in Sociology, Senior Research Fellow, Head of the Department of Social and Political Processes, Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv).

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-8489

Abstract. It has become an axiom in the scientific literature that any civic engagement contributes to democratic transit and the development of civil society. However, different types of this behavior may have different determinants. These may be actions motivated by civic norms and values, but may also be actions driven by financial encouragement or administrative pressure, especially in transitional democracies. The purpose of the study was to identify the impact of modernization values and orientations on different types of civic activism. The author created an indicator where among the options for the answers was offered a list of socio-political measures that were most relevant at the time of the survey. The substantive side of these activities combined the way and the object of communicating their public aspirations and interests. The most common are discussion forms of civil practices that are individualized. These practices do not require much organizational or collective effort and do not require direct interaction with political or governmental institutions. Practices that combine economic activities also have individualized traits, but they require financial costs or sample consumption, so they are less common. Socio-political practices, civic-local practices and protest-demonstration practices are even less common because they require organizational or collective efforts. Five types of civic practices of the Ukrainian population have been empirically identified and their relationship with democracy and liberal values tested. By means of multiple linear regression method, there was found that only civic practices that combine an ethical consumerism, financial donations and political discussions claim that their subjects could be considered as a social basis of Ukraine’s democratic transit. The likelihood of such actions increases with the increase of education levels, decrease of age and living in large settlements. The paradox is that people who profess values of modernization are ready to fund activists, among whom these values are not traced.

Keywords: civic practices, democratic transit, values of modernization.

Publication in: ukr | rus

References

Bekeshkina, I. (2008). Members of public unions as special social group. [In Ukrainian]. In V. Vorona, M. Shulga (Ed.), Ukrainian Society 1992–2008. Sociological monitoring (рр. 382–395). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [= Бекешкіна 2008]

Dalton, R. (2017). The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511583391

Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare's End. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.776871

Golovakha, Ye. (2014). Valuation principles and barriers to modernization in Ukraine. Value component of modernization processes in modern society of Ukraine: collective monograph (pp. 83–96). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: The State Organization “Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine”. https://doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2019-4(86)-124-131 [= Головаха 2014]

Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knoke, D. H. (1990). Networks of political action: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68 (4), 1041–1063. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579133

Onuch, O., Sasse, G. (2016). The Maidan in Movement: Diversity and the Cycles of Protest. Europe-Asia Studies, 68 (3), 556–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1159665

Parvin, P. (2018). Democracy Without Participation: A New Politics for a Disengaged Era. Res Publica, 24 (1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1

Pattie, Ch., Seyd, P., Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and Civic Engagement: Attitudes and Behaviour in Britain. Political studies, 51 (3), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00435

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Quintelier, E., van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting democracy: Political participation and political attitudes. Exploring causality using panel data. Political Studies, 62 (1), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12097

Reznik, O. (2008). The concept of “practice” in sociology. [In Ukrainian]. Social dimensions, 11, 32–41. [= Резнік 2008]

Reznik, O. (2011). Civil Practices in the Transition Society: Factors, Subjects, Methods of Realization. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [= Резнік 2011]

Reznik, O. (2016a). Determinants of Involvement in Work for Voluntary or Charitable Organisations in European Countries. SAGE Open, 6 (1), 1–13.

Reznik, O. (2016b). From the Orange Revolution to the Revolution of Dignity: Dynamics of the Protest Actions in Ukraine. East European Politics and Societies, 30 (4), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325416650255

Reznik, O. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of Ukrainians’ membership in civil society organisations: the social survey findings. [In Ukrainian]. Social dimensions, 10 (21), 287–296. [= Резнік 2018]

Reznik, O. (Ed.), (2019). Sociological dimensions of civil society in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [= Резнік 2019]

Schulz, T., Bailer, S. (2012). The Impact of Organisational Attributes on Political Participation: Results of a Multi-Level Survey from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 18 (1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02052.x

Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/109.3.924

Stepanenko, V. (2015). Civil Society: Discourses and Practices. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [= Степаненко 2015]

Sudakov, V.I. (Ed.), (2018). Social tension in regional dimensions: problems of theory, methodology and methodology of sociological research. Monograph. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Logos. [= Судаков 2018]

Sviatnenko, S., Vinogradov, A. (2014). Euromaidan Values from a Comparative Perspective. Social, Health, and Communication Studies Journal, 1 (1), 41–61.

Theocharis, Y., van Deth, J.W. (2017). Political Participation in a Changing World. Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Citizen Engagement. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728673

van der Meer, T.W.G., van Deth, J.W., Scheepers, P.L.H. (2009). The Politicized Participant: Ideology and Political Action in 20 Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (11), 1426–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332136

van Deth, J. W. (2012). New modes of participation and norms of citizenship. In J.W. van Deth, W.A. Maloney (Eds.), New participatory dimensions in civil society (pp. 115–139). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203142738

Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500020568

Wallman Lundеsen, S. (2015). Civil Society and Political Participation: What Type of Political Participation is Influenced by Community Level Involvement in Civil Society? Swiss Political Science Review, 21 (1), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12140

Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., Delli Carpini, M. (2006). A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.003.0007